EP413 Definitive radiotherapy with low cumulative doses for uterine cervical cancer: a japanese prospective study with no midline block. (1st November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- EP413 Definitive radiotherapy with low cumulative doses for uterine cervical cancer: a japanese prospective study with no midline block. (1st November 2019)
- Main Title:
- EP413 Definitive radiotherapy with low cumulative doses for uterine cervical cancer: a japanese prospective study with no midline block
- Authors:
- Toita, T
Kusada, T
Ariga, T
Kudaka, W
Maemoto, H
Makino, W
Ishikawa, K
Heianna, J
Nagai, Y
Aoki, Y
Murayama, S - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction/Background: A midline block (MB) used in whole pelvic RT (WPRT) hinders accurate interpretation of the treatment outcome due to uncertainty of the RT dose delivered to cervical tumours. Methodology: Patients with cervical cancer of FIGO stages IB1-IVA were eligible for this prospective study. The treatment protocol consisted of WPRT (non-IMRT) without a MB (45 Gy/25 fractions) and CT-based high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT; 15 Gy/3 fractions or 20 Gy/4 fractions, prescribed to point A). The total EQD2 to point A was 63 or 69.3 Gy. The HR-CTV was contoured at the time of the present analyses. If optimisation (manual adjustment of the dwell times) was inadequate to meet the organ-at-risk dose constraints, the point A dose was decreased. Graphical optimisation was not performed. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled. The FIGO stage distribution was IB1, 11; IB2, 13; IIA2, 1: IIB, 11; IIIB, 3; IVA, 1. The median pretreatment tumour diameter was 47 mm (14–81 mm). No patients underwent hybrid ICBT. The point A dose was decreased in 19 of 153 ICBT sessions (12%). Twenty-nine patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 33 months, the 2-year pelvic progression-free survival (PPFS), and overall survival rates were 83%, and 85%, respectively. A HR-CTV D90 threshold of 70 Gy was correlated with the PPFS: 93% for patients receiving ≥70 Gy (n=29) versus 64% for those receiving <70 Gy (n=11) (P=0.018). LateAbstract : Introduction/Background: A midline block (MB) used in whole pelvic RT (WPRT) hinders accurate interpretation of the treatment outcome due to uncertainty of the RT dose delivered to cervical tumours. Methodology: Patients with cervical cancer of FIGO stages IB1-IVA were eligible for this prospective study. The treatment protocol consisted of WPRT (non-IMRT) without a MB (45 Gy/25 fractions) and CT-based high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT; 15 Gy/3 fractions or 20 Gy/4 fractions, prescribed to point A). The total EQD2 to point A was 63 or 69.3 Gy. The HR-CTV was contoured at the time of the present analyses. If optimisation (manual adjustment of the dwell times) was inadequate to meet the organ-at-risk dose constraints, the point A dose was decreased. Graphical optimisation was not performed. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled. The FIGO stage distribution was IB1, 11; IB2, 13; IIA2, 1: IIB, 11; IIIB, 3; IVA, 1. The median pretreatment tumour diameter was 47 mm (14–81 mm). No patients underwent hybrid ICBT. The point A dose was decreased in 19 of 153 ICBT sessions (12%). Twenty-nine patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 33 months, the 2-year pelvic progression-free survival (PPFS), and overall survival rates were 83%, and 85%, respectively. A HR-CTV D90 threshold of 70 Gy was correlated with the PPFS: 93% for patients receiving ≥70 Gy (n=29) versus 64% for those receiving <70 Gy (n=11) (P=0.018). Late adverse events (grade ≥3) were observed in three patients (bladder in two, rectum in one). Conclusion: Definitive RT consisting of WPRT without a MB and HDR-ICBT was feasible in our cohort of Japanese patients. A low RT dose might be adequate for patients with non-bulky tumours. Proper 3D-IGBT using graphical optimisation and a suitable hybrid technique, based on appropriate HR-CTV contouring, is recommended to improve outcomes further. Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynecological cancer. Volume 29(2019)Supplement 4
- Journal:
- International journal of gynecological cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 29(2019)Supplement 4
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 4 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0029-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- A270
- Page End:
- A271
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-01
- Subjects:
- Generative organs, Female -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99465 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ijgc/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118544021/toc ↗
https://ijgc.bmj.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/ijgc-2019-ESGO.472 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1048-891X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19764.xml