Laparoscopically assisted versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer—the Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open (ROMIO) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Issue 11 (19th November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Laparoscopically assisted versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer—the Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open (ROMIO) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Issue 11 (19th November 2019)
- Main Title:
- Laparoscopically assisted versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer—the Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open (ROMIO) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT)
- Authors:
- Brierley, Rachel C
Gaunt, Daisy
Metcalfe, Chris
Blazeby, Jane M
Blencowe, Natalie S
Jepson, Marcus
Berrisford, Richard G
Avery, Kerry N L
Hollingworth, William
Rice, Caoimhe T
Moure-Fernandez, Aida
Wong, Newton
Nicklin, Joanna
Skilton, Anni
Boddy, Alex
Byrne, James P
Underwood, Tim
Vohra, Ravi
Catton, James A
Pursnani, Kish
Melhado, Rachel
Alkhaffaf, Bilal
Krysztopik, Richard
Lamb, Peter
Culliford, Lucy
Rogers, Chris
Howes, Benjamin
Chalmers, Katy
Cousins, Sian
Elliott, Jackie
Donovan, Jenny
Heys, Rachael
Wickens, Robin A
Wilkerson, Paul
Hollowood, Andrew
Streets, Christopher
Titcomb, Dan
Humphreys, Martyn Lee
Wheatley, Tim
Sanders, Grant
Ariyarathenam, Arun
Kelly, Jamie
Noble, Fergus
Couper, Graeme
Skipworth, Richard J E
Deans, Chris
Ubhi, Sukhbir
Williams, Robert
Bowrey, David
Exon, David
Turner, Paul
Daya Shetty, Vinutha
Chaparala, Ram
Akhtar, Khurshid
Farooq, Naheed
Parsons, Simon L
Welch, Neil T
Houlihan, Rebecca J
Smith, Joanne
Schranz, Rachel
Rea, Nicola
Cooke, Jill
Williams, Alexandra
Hindmarsh, Carolyn
Maitland, Sally
Howie, Lucy
Barham, Christopher Paul
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Surgery (oesophagectomy), with neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, is the main curative treatment for patients with oesophageal cancer. Several surgical approaches can be used to remove an oesophageal tumour. The Ivor Lewis (two-phase procedure) is usually used in the UK. This can be performed as an open oesophagectomy (OO), a laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy (LAO) or a totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy (TMIO). All three are performed in the National Health Service, with LAO and OO the most common. However, there is limited evidence about which surgical approach is best for patients in terms of survival and postoperative health-related quality of life. Methods and analysis: We will undertake a UK multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare LAO with OO in adult patients with oesophageal cancer. The primary outcome is patient-reported physical function at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively and 3 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include: postoperative complications, survival, disease recurrence, other measures of quality of life, spirometry, success of patient blinding and quality assurance measures. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed comparing LAO with OO. We will embed a randomised substudy to evaluate the safety and evolution of the TMIO procedure and a qualitative recruitment intervention to optimise patient recruitment. We will analyse the primary outcome using a multi-level regression model. Patients willAbstract : Introduction: Surgery (oesophagectomy), with neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy, is the main curative treatment for patients with oesophageal cancer. Several surgical approaches can be used to remove an oesophageal tumour. The Ivor Lewis (two-phase procedure) is usually used in the UK. This can be performed as an open oesophagectomy (OO), a laparoscopically assisted oesophagectomy (LAO) or a totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy (TMIO). All three are performed in the National Health Service, with LAO and OO the most common. However, there is limited evidence about which surgical approach is best for patients in terms of survival and postoperative health-related quality of life. Methods and analysis: We will undertake a UK multicentre randomised controlled trial to compare LAO with OO in adult patients with oesophageal cancer. The primary outcome is patient-reported physical function at 3 and 6 weeks postoperatively and 3 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include: postoperative complications, survival, disease recurrence, other measures of quality of life, spirometry, success of patient blinding and quality assurance measures. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed comparing LAO with OO. We will embed a randomised substudy to evaluate the safety and evolution of the TMIO procedure and a qualitative recruitment intervention to optimise patient recruitment. We will analyse the primary outcome using a multi-level regression model. Patients will be monitored for up to 3 years after their surgery. Ethics and dissemination: This study received ethical approval from the South-West Franchay Research Ethics Committee. We will submit the results for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number: ISRCTN10386621 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 11(2019)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 11(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 11 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0009-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-19
- Subjects:
- oesophageal cancer -- oesophagectomy -- quality of life -- randomised controlled trial -- minimally invasive oesophagectomy
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030907 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19785.xml