1 Avelumab in combination with and/or following chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients with ovarian cancer: biomarker analyses from the phase 3 JAVELIN Ovarian 100 trial. (13th November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 1 Avelumab in combination with and/or following chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients with ovarian cancer: biomarker analyses from the phase 3 JAVELIN Ovarian 100 trial. (13th November 2020)
- Main Title:
- 1 Avelumab in combination with and/or following chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients with ovarian cancer: biomarker analyses from the phase 3 JAVELIN Ovarian 100 trial
- Authors:
- Ledermann, J
Colombo, N
Oza, A
Fujiwara, K
Birrer, MJ
Randall, L
Poddubskaya, E
Scambia, G
Shparyk, YV
Lim, MC
Lim, MC
Sohn, J
Yonemori, K
Stewart, RA
Zhang, X
Perkins Smith, J
Linn, C
Monk, BJ - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: In the JAVELIN Ovarian 100 trial (NCT02718417 ), avelumab (anti–PD-L1) in combination with chemotherapy or as maintenance did not improve progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy followed by observation in treatment-naive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC; hazard ratios [95% CI] were 1.14 [0.832, 1.565] and 1.43 [1.051, 1.946], respectively). The trial was terminated when prespecified futility boundaries were crossed at the interim analysis, and study treatment was subsequently discontinued. Here we report biomarker analyses. Methods: Women with stage III-IV EOC (post debulking/cytoreductive surgery or candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy (6 cycles) followed by avelumab every 2 weeks as maintenance (CTx→Ave), chemotherapy + avelumab (10 mg/kg every 3 weeks) followed by avelumab every 2 weeks as maintenance (CTx+Ave→Ave), or chemotherapy followed by observation (CTx→O; control arm). The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review per RECIST version 1.1. Pretreatment tumor tissue was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (CD8 and PD-L1) and next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing. Results: 998 patients were randomized. Subgroup analyses based on PD-L1, CD8, and germline BRCA1/2 status did not identify subsets with clear PFS benefit in either avelumab arm vs control (table 1 ). Whole-exome and RNA sequencing analyses will be presented. Conclusions: InAbstract : Introduction: In the JAVELIN Ovarian 100 trial (NCT02718417 ), avelumab (anti–PD-L1) in combination with chemotherapy or as maintenance did not improve progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy followed by observation in treatment-naive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC; hazard ratios [95% CI] were 1.14 [0.832, 1.565] and 1.43 [1.051, 1.946], respectively). The trial was terminated when prespecified futility boundaries were crossed at the interim analysis, and study treatment was subsequently discontinued. Here we report biomarker analyses. Methods: Women with stage III-IV EOC (post debulking/cytoreductive surgery or candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy (6 cycles) followed by avelumab every 2 weeks as maintenance (CTx→Ave), chemotherapy + avelumab (10 mg/kg every 3 weeks) followed by avelumab every 2 weeks as maintenance (CTx+Ave→Ave), or chemotherapy followed by observation (CTx→O; control arm). The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review per RECIST version 1.1. Pretreatment tumor tissue was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (CD8 and PD-L1) and next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing. Results: 998 patients were randomized. Subgroup analyses based on PD-L1, CD8, and germline BRCA1/2 status did not identify subsets with clear PFS benefit in either avelumab arm vs control (table 1 ). Whole-exome and RNA sequencing analyses will be presented. Conclusions: In the JAVELIN Ovarian 100 trial, PD-L1, CD8, and germline BRCA1/2 status did not predict differential clinical benefit with the addition of avelumab to chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients with EOC. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynecological cancer. Volume 30(2020)Supplement 3
- Journal:
- International journal of gynecological cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 30(2020)Supplement 3
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0030-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- A1
- Page End:
- A1
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-13
- Subjects:
- Generative organs, Female -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99465 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ijgc/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118544021/toc ↗
https://ijgc.bmj.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/ijgc-2020-IGCS.1 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1048-891X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19784.xml