13 Efficacy on individualized starting dose (ISD) and fixed starting dose (FSD) of niraparib per investigator-assessment (IA) in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC). (13th November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 13 Efficacy on individualized starting dose (ISD) and fixed starting dose (FSD) of niraparib per investigator-assessment (IA) in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC). (13th November 2020)
- Main Title:
- 13 Efficacy on individualized starting dose (ISD) and fixed starting dose (FSD) of niraparib per investigator-assessment (IA) in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC)
- Authors:
- Graybill, W
Mirza, M
González-Martin, A
O'Malley, D
Gaba, L
Yap, OWS
Guerra, E
Rose, PG
Baurain, J
Ghamande, S
Denys, H
Prendergast, E
Pisano, C
Follana, P
Braicu, EI
Calvert, PM
Korach, J
Li, Y
Gupta, D
Monk, BJ - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved for maintenance treatment of patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent OC that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy and treatment in heavily-pretreated recurrent OC. Here we report efficacy in patients receiving the FSD and ISD in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016 ). Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study randomized 733 patients to receive niraparib or placebo for 36 months or until disease progression/toxicity. A protocol amendment introduced ISD: 200 mg in patients with body weight <77 kg or platelets <150, 000/µL, or 300 mg in all others. The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). IA PFS was a sensitivity analysis. At the primary analysis data cut, follow-up was 11.2 months and 17.1 months in the ISD and FSD subgroups, respectively. An ad hoc analysis of IA PFS was performed using an updated data cut with additional 6 months follow-up. Results: BICR and IA PFS were highly concordant in the overall population. Efficacy of niraparib based on IA PFS in FSD vs ISD subgroups for each data cut were similar (table 1 ). Dose interruptions, modifications, and hematologic toxicity were lower with the ISD. Exposure–response data supported the clinical data. Conclusions: The 200- or 300-mg ISD by baseline body weight and platelet counts demonstrated comparable efficacy while improving the safety profile of niraparib. Use ofAbstract : Introduction: Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved for maintenance treatment of patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent OC that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy and treatment in heavily-pretreated recurrent OC. Here we report efficacy in patients receiving the FSD and ISD in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016 ). Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study randomized 733 patients to receive niraparib or placebo for 36 months or until disease progression/toxicity. A protocol amendment introduced ISD: 200 mg in patients with body weight <77 kg or platelets <150, 000/µL, or 300 mg in all others. The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR). IA PFS was a sensitivity analysis. At the primary analysis data cut, follow-up was 11.2 months and 17.1 months in the ISD and FSD subgroups, respectively. An ad hoc analysis of IA PFS was performed using an updated data cut with additional 6 months follow-up. Results: BICR and IA PFS were highly concordant in the overall population. Efficacy of niraparib based on IA PFS in FSD vs ISD subgroups for each data cut were similar (table 1 ). Dose interruptions, modifications, and hematologic toxicity were lower with the ISD. Exposure–response data supported the clinical data. Conclusions: The 200- or 300-mg ISD by baseline body weight and platelet counts demonstrated comparable efficacy while improving the safety profile of niraparib. Use of this regimen for first-line maintenance of advanced OC patients is approved by the US FDA. Funded by: GlaxoSmithKline NCT: NCT02655016 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynecological cancer. Volume 30(2020)Supplement 3
- Journal:
- International journal of gynecological cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 30(2020)Supplement 3
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0030-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- A10
- Page End:
- A10
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-13
- Subjects:
- Generative organs, Female -- Cancer -- Periodicals
616.99465 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ijgc/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118544021/toc ↗
https://ijgc.bmj.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/ijgc-2020-IGCS.13 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1048-891X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19784.xml