Implementation of holistic review into emergency medicine residency application screening to improve recruitment of underrepresented in medicine applicants. (29th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sungar, W. Gannon; Angerhofer, Christy; McCormick, Taylor; Zimmer, Shanta; Druck, Jeff; Kaplan, Bonnie; Ward‐Gaines, Jacqueline
• Is Part Of: AEM education and training. Volume 5(2021)supplement 1
• Page Start: S10
• Page End: S18
• Publication Date: 2021-09-29
• Subjects: Emergency medicine -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Emergency medicine -- Study and teaching -- United States -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10662
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2472-5390

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Increasing the diversity of the emergency medicine (EM) workforce is imperative, with more diverse teams showing improved patient care and increased innovation. Holistic review, adapted from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), focuses on screening applicants with a balanced method, valuing their experiences, attributes, and academic metrics equally. A core tenet to holistic review is that diversity is essential to excellence. Objective: Implementation of holistic review into the residency application screening process is effective at improving exposure to underrepresented in medicine (URiM) applicants. Methods: After adjustment of our residency application screening rubric, improving our balance across the experience, attributes, and metrics domains, we conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the representation of URiM applicants invited to interview, interviewed, and ranked by composite score compared to our previous primarily metric‐based process. Results: A total of 8, 343 applicants were included in the study. Following implementation of holistic review, we saw an increase in the absolute percent of URiM applicants invited to interview (+11%, 95% confidence interview [CI] = 6.9% to 15.4%, p < 0.01), interviewed (+7.9%, 95% CI = 3.6% to 12.2%, p < 0.01), and represented in the top 75 through top 200 cutpoints based on composite score rank. The mean composite score for URiM applicants increased significantly compared to non‐URiM applicants (+9.7, 95% CI = 8.2 to 11.2, p < 0.01 vs. +4.7, 95% CI = 3.5 to 5.9, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Holistic review can be used as a systematic and equitable tool to increase the exposure and recruitment of URiM applicants in EM training programs.