Mesenchymal stromal cell extracellular vesicles as therapy for acute and chronic respiratory diseases: A meta‐analysis. Issue 12 (1st October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tieu, Alvin; Hu, Kevin; Gnyra, Catherine; Montroy, Joshua; Fergusson, Dean A.; Allan, David S.; Stewart, Duncan J.; Thébaud, Bernard; Lalu, Manoj M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of extracellular vesicles. Volume 10:Issue 12(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-10-01
• Subjects: exosomes -- lung -- mesenchymal stem cells -- mesenchymal stromal cells extracellular vesicles -- meta‐analysis -- respiratory -- systematic review; Cells -- Mechanical properties -- Periodicals; Transport Vesicles; Cells -- Mechanical properties; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 571.63
• DOI: 10.1002/jev2.12141
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2001-3078

Abstract

Abstract: Preclinical studies suggest mesenchymal stromal cell extracellular vesicles (MSC‐EVs) reduce inflammation and improve organ function in lung diseases; however, an objective analysis of all available data is needed prior to translation. Using rigorous meta‐research methods, we determined the effectiveness of MSC‐EVs for preclinical respiratory diseases and identified experimental conditions that may further refine this therapy. A systematic search of MEDLINE/Embase identified 1167 records. After screening, 52 articles were included for data extraction and evaluated for risk of bias and quality of reporting in study design. A random effects meta‐analysis was conducted for acute lung injury (ALI; N = 23), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD; N = 8) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH; N = 7). Subgroup analyses identified EV methods/characteristics that may be associated with improved efficacy. Data is presented as standardized mean differences (SMD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For ALI, MSC‐EVs markedly reduced lung injury (SMD ‐4.33, CI ‐5.73 to ‐2.92), vascular permeability (SMD ‐2.43, CI ‐3.05 to ‐1.82), and mortality (RR 0.39, CI 0.22 to 0.68). Small EVs were more consistently effective than large EVs whereas no differences were observed between tissue sources, immunocompatibility or isolation techniques. For BPD, alveolarization was improved by MSC‐EVs (SMD ‐1.45, CI ‐2.08 to ‐0.82) with small EVs more consistently beneficial then small/large EVs. In PAH, right ventricular systolic pressure (SMD ‐4.16, CI ‐5.68 to ‐2.64) and hypertrophy (SMD ‐2.80, CI ‐3.68 to ‐1.91) were significantly attenuated by EVs. In BPD and PAH, EVs isolated by ultracentrifugation demonstrated therapeutic benefit whereas tangential flow filtration (N = 2) displayed minimal efficacy. Lastly, risk of bias and quality of reporting for experimental design were consistently unclear across all studies. Our findings demonstrate clear potential of MSC‐EVs to be developed as therapy for acute and chronic lung diseases. However, greater transparency in research design and direct comparisons of isolation technique and EV subtypes are needed to generate robust evidence to guide clinical translation. Protocol Registration : PROSPERO CRD42020145334