Self‐collection cervical screening in the renewed National Cervical Screening Program: a qualitative study. Issue 8 (18th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Creagh, Nicola S; Zammit, Claire; Brotherton, Julia ML; Saville, Marion; McDermott, Tracey; Nightingale, Claire; Kelaher, Margaret
• Is Part Of: Medical journal of Australia. Volume 215:Issue 8(2021)
• Page Start: 354
• Page End: 358
• Publication Date: 2021-06-18
• Subjects: Uterine cervical neoplasms -- Health services research; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine; Médecine -- Périodiques; Medicine; Periodical; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610
• DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51137
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-729X

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the implementation and acceptability of the self‐collection cervical screening pathway since commencement of the renewed National Cervical Screening Program (rNCSP), from the perspectives of screening participants and primary care practitioners. Design, setting, participants: Qualitative study; individual semi‐structured interviews with 45 screening participants and 18 primary care practitioners in Victoria who had engaged with the self‐collection pathway during the first 17 months of the rNCSP (1 December 2017 ‒ 30 April 2019). Results: The self‐collection pathway was highly acceptable as an alternative cervical screening pathway for most participating screening participants and practitioners. Some screening participants indicated that they would not have been screened had the pathway not been available. Acceptability was lower among those who had tested positive for HPV types not 16/18, a result that requires additional testing of a clinician‐collected cervical sample. Use of the self‐collection pathway is driven more by practitioners than their patients. Interpretations of the self‐collection guidelines varied between practices. Barriers to expanding promotion of the pathway by practitioners included difficulties with identifying eligible participants. Conclusions: Increasing the accessibility of the self‐collection pathway to under‐ and never screened women could reduce inequities in cervical cancer outcomes for those not participating in the main screening pathway. Practitioners should be provided resources to integrate self‐collection into routine practice and to efficiently implement the entire self‐collection pathway, in order to maximise its use and to optimise the experience for screening participants.