306 Predictors of immunotherapy benefit in Merkel cell carcinoma. (9th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kacew, Alec; Dharaneeswaran, Harita; Starrett, Gabriel; Thakuria, Manisha; LeBoeuf, Nicole; Silk, Ann; DeCaprio, James; Hanna, Glenn
• Is Part Of: Journal for immunotherapy of cancer. Volume 8(2020)Supplement 3
• Page Start: A333
• Page End: A333
• Publication Date: 2020-11-09
• Subjects: Cancer -- Immunotherapy -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Immunological aspects -- Periodicals; Tumors -- Immunological aspects -- Periodicals; Immunotherapy -- Periodicals; 616.99406105
• DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-SITC2020.0306
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2051-1426

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare cancer for which the standard-of-care is immune checkpoint blockade in the recurrent/metastatic setting. However, immunotherapy is not effective in all patients. A greater understanding of molecular mechanisms and potential predictive biomarkers are unmet needs for clinicians and researchers. Methods: We undertook a retrospective analysis of 45 patients treated at our institution from 2013 to 2020 to understand the clinical and genomic correlates of clinical benefit from immunotherapy. We gathered data from the electronic health record, including provider notes and results from our institutional next-generation sequencing panel of actionable genomic alterations. Results: Our cohort predominantly included individuals with stage III disease at diagnosis and stage IV disease at the time of diagnosis of recurrent/metastatic disease. Most patients received immunotherapy in the first line. 43% of patients experienced an objective response to immunotherapy (median duration of response 24.2 months, 95% confidence interval 8.8-not reached) and median overall survival was 15.5 months (95% confidence interval 9.0–28.7) (median follow-up 25.2 months). Lower stage at diagnosis of primary disease and shorter disease-free interval between completion of initial treatment and recurrence were each associated with greater odds of response (odds ratio of 0.06, p=0.04 for stage; odds ratio 0.75, p=0.05 for disease-free interval). The most common single-nucleotide variants among the sequenced cohort were those in TP53 (59%) and RB1 (51%). Single-nucleotide variants in the ARID2 and NTRK1 genes were associated with response without Bonferroni correction (p=0.05), while none of Merkel cell polyomavirus status, total mutational burden, ultraviolet mutational signatures, and copy-number alterations predicted outcomes (figure 1). Conclusions: Patients with shorter disease-free interval after definitive treatment may be particularly suitable candidates for immunotherapy. Our molecular findings point to ARID2 and NTRK1 as potential predictive markers and/or therapeutic targets (e.g., with Trk inhibitors), although this association needs to be confirmed in a larger sample. Acknowledgements: AJK receives research funding from the American Society of Hematology and from the Pritzker School of Medicine. Ethics Approval: The study was approved by the Dana-Farber institutional review board, protocol numbers 11–104 and 17–000. Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.