PTU-229 The effect of frame rate and view mode on lesion detectability by novice and expert capsule endoscopists during reading. (28th May 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- PTU-229 The effect of frame rate and view mode on lesion detectability by novice and expert capsule endoscopists during reading. (28th May 2012)
- Main Title:
- PTU-229 The effect of frame rate and view mode on lesion detectability by novice and expert capsule endoscopists during reading
- Authors:
- Nakamura, M
Murino, A
Fitzpatrick, A
Komeda, Y
La Nauze, R
Green, S
Fraser, C - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: The RAPID 7 Access reading software (Given Imaging Ltd) allows the capsule endoscopist to adjust the frame rate of presented images (adjustable frame rate, AFR) and their view mode (VM1 - single view; VM2 - dual view; VM4 - quad view) during capsule endoscopy (CE) reading. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between AFR, VM, lesion miss rate and reading time between non-expert (NEXs) and expert (EXs) capsule endoscopists. Methods: One short video clip containing 60 positive images of angioectasias was selected from our CE database. The clip was read by 3 EXs and 3 NEXs using nine different combinations of VM and AFR (1, 2 and 4 VMs × 10, 15 and 25 fps) presented in randomised order. Readers were asked to count each positive image of an angioectasia using a manual counter, without interrupting the video clip. Results: The reading times at 10, 15 and 25 fps were 54, 34 and 20 s, respectively for any VM. Considering 10 fps as the gold standard, an AFR of 15 and 25 fps resulted in a reduction in reading time of 37% and 63% respectively. The number of positive images detected using 10, 15 and 25 fps (all VM's combined) were 45, 31 and 22 respectively. The mean number of detected positive images (MPI) using 10 fps was significantly higher than an AFR of 15 and 25 fps (p=0.04, 0.01). For VM1, VM2 and VM4, the MPI was 24, 36 and 38 respectively. The MPI using VM2 and VM4 was significantly higher than for VM1 (p=0.01, 0.003). VM4 × 10 fpsAbstract : Introduction: The RAPID 7 Access reading software (Given Imaging Ltd) allows the capsule endoscopist to adjust the frame rate of presented images (adjustable frame rate, AFR) and their view mode (VM1 - single view; VM2 - dual view; VM4 - quad view) during capsule endoscopy (CE) reading. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between AFR, VM, lesion miss rate and reading time between non-expert (NEXs) and expert (EXs) capsule endoscopists. Methods: One short video clip containing 60 positive images of angioectasias was selected from our CE database. The clip was read by 3 EXs and 3 NEXs using nine different combinations of VM and AFR (1, 2 and 4 VMs × 10, 15 and 25 fps) presented in randomised order. Readers were asked to count each positive image of an angioectasia using a manual counter, without interrupting the video clip. Results: The reading times at 10, 15 and 25 fps were 54, 34 and 20 s, respectively for any VM. Considering 10 fps as the gold standard, an AFR of 15 and 25 fps resulted in a reduction in reading time of 37% and 63% respectively. The number of positive images detected using 10, 15 and 25 fps (all VM's combined) were 45, 31 and 22 respectively. The mean number of detected positive images (MPI) using 10 fps was significantly higher than an AFR of 15 and 25 fps (p=0.04, 0.01). For VM1, VM2 and VM4, the MPI was 24, 36 and 38 respectively. The MPI using VM2 and VM4 was significantly higher than for VM1 (p=0.01, 0.003). VM4 × 10 fps had highest MPI (51) while VM1 × 25 fps had the lowest MPI (14). MPIs of NEX and EX (all VM's combined) were 34 and 32 and were not significantly different. Conclusion: While a higher AFR results in a reduction in reading time, lesion detectability is reduced and miss rates increase. Higher MPIs are associated with lower AFRs and an increase in VM. In this study the optimal combination for lesion detectability was VM4 × 10 fps. NEXs and EXs performed similarly for the detection of angioectasias. Competing interests: None declared. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Gut. Volume 61(2012)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Gut
- Issue:
- Volume 61(2012)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 2 (2012)
- Year:
- 2012
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2012-0061-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- A279
- Page End:
- A279
- Publication Date:
- 2012-05-28
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
616.33 - Journal URLs:
- http://gut.bmjjournals.com ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514c.229 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-5749
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19725.xml