OC-024 Volatile organic compounds predict response to both low fodmap diet and probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. (17th June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rossi, M; Aggio, R; Staudacher, H; Lomer, M; Lindsay, J; Irving, P; Probert, C; Whelan, K
• Is Part Of: Gut. Volume 66(2017)Supplement 2
• Page Start: A12
• Page End: A13
• Publication Date: 2017-06-17
• Subjects: irritable bowel syndrome -- low FODMAP diet -- probiotics -- volatile organic compounds; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314472.24
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-5749

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Dietary intervention is an effective therapy for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), with restriction of fermentable carbohydrates (low FODMAP diet, LFD) and microbial therapies such as probiotics showing efficacy in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a non-invasive diagnostic model using faecal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in IBS could be used to identify (i) what factors at baseline are associated with response to dietary interventions; and (ii) what factors at end of treatment are associated with response. Method: Adults fulfilling Rome III criteria for IBS were recruited to a 2 × 2 factorial randomised controlled trial and randomised to a low FODMAP diet (LFD) or placebo dietary advice (sham diet) and to multi-strain probiotic (VSL#3) or placebo for 4 weeks. Response to either intervention was defined as a reduction of ≥50 points for the validated IBS symptom scoring system (IBS-SSS). Faecal VOCs were analysed by a gas chromatography – sensor device (Odoreader). VOC profiles were processed using an in-house pipeline involving wavelet transformation followed by feature selection based on random forest. Using the selected features, a partial least squares (PLS) classifier was constructed to classify VOC profiles from responders and non-responders and accuracies determined using 10-fold cross-validation. Results: A total of 95 patients completed the study of whom 93 (63 females, 68%) provided sufficient sample for analysis. More patients responded to LFD (37/46, 80%) compared to sham (21/47, 45%)(p<0.001) but there was no difference between probiotic (31/49, 63%) and placebo (27/44, 61%)(p=0.850). The PCA identified (i) 15 compounds at baseline that explained 25% of variation in response to the LFD (PLS mean accuracy of 97%; CI 96%–99%, Figure 1) and 10 compounds that explained 30% of variation in response to the probiotics (PLS mean accuracy of 88%; CI 86%–92%); and (ii) 9 compounds at end of treatment that explained 31% of response to LFD (PLS mean accuracy of 96%; CI 93%–98%) and 11 compounds that explained 27% of variation in response to the probiotics (PLS mean accuracy of 91%; CI 88%–94%). Conclusion: Faecal VOC profiling is a low cost, non-invasive tool that may help predict response to dietary intervention in IBS patients as well as shedding light on mechanisms underpinning response. Clinical trials using this algorithm are needed, and if successful, will pave the way for personalised treatment plans in IBS. Disclosure of Interest: None Declared