ESRA19-0406 Pain relief after shoulder surgery – what happens when the block wears off?. (30th August 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- ESRA19-0406 Pain relief after shoulder surgery – what happens when the block wears off?. (30th August 2019)
- Main Title:
- ESRA19-0406 Pain relief after shoulder surgery – what happens when the block wears off?
- Authors:
- Mcivor, C
Mitchell, J
Ramsey, J - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background and aims: Brachial plexus blockade is an effective form of analgesia for shoulder surgery. Once the nerve block subsides the management of pain becomes a major challenge for anaesthetists. A standard for best practice suggests that 100% of patients should be satisfied with their pain management plan. Methods: Patient's consented prior to surgery for a follow up telephone call 2–4 days post-operatively. It was agreed that formal ethics approval was not required and all data was anonymised. Detailed pain scores and analgesia requirements were explored on the follow up. Results: 30 patients identified, 8 lost to follow-up. The average blocks duration was 25.84 hours. 27% of patients reported severe pain at rest with 45% experiencing severe pain during movement. 36% of patients felt they did not have sufficient analgesia once discharged home. 8 out of 22 felt they needed stronger pain relief. All but 1 patient stated that they would have a repeat nerve block. Once the nerve block wore off it was clear that a large number of patients had inadequate analgesia. Despite the introduction of oxycodone to supplement analgesia, and a patient information leaflet to give advice on pain relief, patients often did not take analgesia as prescribed. Conclusions: Single injection brachial plexus blocks are limited to a time span shorter than the duration of moderate to severe post-operative pain. The gold standard technique is continuous interscalene blocks (CISB) albeitAbstract : Background and aims: Brachial plexus blockade is an effective form of analgesia for shoulder surgery. Once the nerve block subsides the management of pain becomes a major challenge for anaesthetists. A standard for best practice suggests that 100% of patients should be satisfied with their pain management plan. Methods: Patient's consented prior to surgery for a follow up telephone call 2–4 days post-operatively. It was agreed that formal ethics approval was not required and all data was anonymised. Detailed pain scores and analgesia requirements were explored on the follow up. Results: 30 patients identified, 8 lost to follow-up. The average blocks duration was 25.84 hours. 27% of patients reported severe pain at rest with 45% experiencing severe pain during movement. 36% of patients felt they did not have sufficient analgesia once discharged home. 8 out of 22 felt they needed stronger pain relief. All but 1 patient stated that they would have a repeat nerve block. Once the nerve block wore off it was clear that a large number of patients had inadequate analgesia. Despite the introduction of oxycodone to supplement analgesia, and a patient information leaflet to give advice on pain relief, patients often did not take analgesia as prescribed. Conclusions: Single injection brachial plexus blocks are limited to a time span shorter than the duration of moderate to severe post-operative pain. The gold standard technique is continuous interscalene blocks (CISB) albeit technically challenging. Future work should concentrate on overcoming the barriers to CISB and aim to increase its uptake. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Volume 44(2019)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 44(2019)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 44, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0044-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A220
- Page End:
- A221
- Publication Date:
- 2019-08-30
- Subjects:
- Conduction anesthesia -- Periodicals
Pain medicine -- Periodicals
617.964 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.rapm.org/ ↗
https://journals.lww.com/rapm/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10987339 ↗
https://rapm.bmj.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/rapm-2019-ESRAABS2019.385 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1098-7339
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7336.572210
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19700.xml