Assessment of Sepsis-3 criteria and quick SOFA in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections. Issue 10 (31st August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Piano, Salvatore; Bartoletti, Michele; Tonon, Marta; Baldassarre, Maurizio; Chies, Giada; Romano, Antonietta; Viale, Pierluigi; Vettore, Elia; Domenicali, Marco; Stanco, Marialuisa; Pilutti, Chiara; Frigo, Anna Chiara; Brocca, Alessandra; Bernardi, Mauro; Caraceni, Paolo; Angeli, Paolo
• Is Part Of: Gut. Volume 67:Issue 10(2018)
• Page Start: 1892
• Page End: 1899
• Publication Date: 2017-08-31
• Subjects: sepsis -- acute on chronic liver failure -- septic shock -- liver transplantation -- liver cirrhosis; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314324
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-5749

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Patients with cirrhosis have a high risk of sepsis, which confers a poor prognosis. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria have several limitations in cirrhosis. Recently, new criteria for sepsis (Sepsis-3) have been suggested in the general population (increase of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) ≥2 points from baseline). Outside the intensive care unit (ICU), the quick SOFA (qSOFA (at least two among alteration in mental status, systolic blood pressure ≤100 mm Hg or respiratory rate ≥22/min)) was suggested to screen for sepsis. These criteria have never been evaluated in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of the study was to assess the ability of Sepsis-3 criteria in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial/fungal infections. Methods: 259 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and bacterial/fungal infections were prospectively included. Demographic, laboratory and microbiological data were collected at diagnosis of infection. Baseline SOFA was assessed using preadmission data. Patients were followed up until death, liver transplantation or discharge. Findings were externally validated (197 patients). Results: Sepsis-3 and qSOFA had significantly greater discrimination for in-hospital mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC)=0.784 and 0.732, respectively) than SIRS (AUROC=0.606) (p<0.01 for both). Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Sepsis-3 (subdistribution HR (sHR)=5.47; p=0.006), qSOFA (sHR=1.99; p=0.020), Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute Decompensation score (sHR=1.05; p=0.001) and C reactive protein (sHR=1.01;p=0.034) were found to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Patients with Sepsis-3 had higher incidence of acute-on-chronic liver failure, septic shock and transfer to ICU than those without Sepsis-3. Conclusions: Sepsis-3 criteria are more accurate than SIRS criteria in predicting the severity of infections in patients with cirrhosis. qSOFA is a useful bedside tool to assess risk for worse outcomes in these patients. Patients with Sepsis-3 and positive qSOFA deserve more intensive management and strict surveillance.