Efficacy and safety of short duration azithromycin eye drops versus azithromycin single oral dose for the treatment of trachoma in children: a randomised, controlled, double-masked clinical trial. Issue 5 (27th September 2006)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and safety of short duration azithromycin eye drops versus azithromycin single oral dose for the treatment of trachoma in children: a randomised, controlled, double-masked clinical trial. Issue 5 (27th September 2006)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and safety of short duration azithromycin eye drops versus azithromycin single oral dose for the treatment of trachoma in children: a randomised, controlled, double-masked clinical trial
- Authors:
- Cochereau, Isabelle
Goldschmidt, Pablo
Goepogui, André
Afghani, Tayyab
Delval, Laurent
Pouliquen, Pascale
Bourcier, Tristan
Robert, Pierre-Yves - Abstract:
- Abstract : Aims: Efficacy and safety of a short-duration treatment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus oral azithromycin to treat active trachoma. Methods: Randomised, controlled, double-masked, double-dummy, non-inferiority explanatory study including 670 children from Guinea Conakry and Pakistan if: 1–10 years old; active trachoma (TF+TI0 or TF+TI+ on simplified World Health Organisation (WHO) scale). Three groups received either: azithromycin 1.5% eye drops twice daily for 2 days, for 3 days or azithromycin single 20 mg/kg oral dose. Patients' contacts were treated whenever possible. Clinical evaluation was performed using a binocular loupe. Primary efficacy variable was the cure (no active trachoma (TF0)) at day 60. Non-inferiority margin for difference between cure rates was 10%. Results: Cure rate in per protocol set was as follows: 93.0%, 96.3% and 96.6% in 2-day group 3-day group, and oral treatment group, respectively. Azithromycin 1.5% groups were non-inferior to oral azithromycin. The intend to treat (ITT) analysis supported the results. Clinical re-emergence rate was low: 4.2%. Ocular tolerance was similar for all groups. No treatment related adverse events were reported. Logistic regression analyses found prognostic factors such as: country (p<0.001) and trachoma severity (p = 0.003). Conclusions: In active trachoma, azithromycin eye drops twice daily for 2 or 3 days are as efficient as the WHO's reference treatment and represent an innovative alternative toAbstract : Aims: Efficacy and safety of a short-duration treatment of azithromycin 1.5% eye drops versus oral azithromycin to treat active trachoma. Methods: Randomised, controlled, double-masked, double-dummy, non-inferiority explanatory study including 670 children from Guinea Conakry and Pakistan if: 1–10 years old; active trachoma (TF+TI0 or TF+TI+ on simplified World Health Organisation (WHO) scale). Three groups received either: azithromycin 1.5% eye drops twice daily for 2 days, for 3 days or azithromycin single 20 mg/kg oral dose. Patients' contacts were treated whenever possible. Clinical evaluation was performed using a binocular loupe. Primary efficacy variable was the cure (no active trachoma (TF0)) at day 60. Non-inferiority margin for difference between cure rates was 10%. Results: Cure rate in per protocol set was as follows: 93.0%, 96.3% and 96.6% in 2-day group 3-day group, and oral treatment group, respectively. Azithromycin 1.5% groups were non-inferior to oral azithromycin. The intend to treat (ITT) analysis supported the results. Clinical re-emergence rate was low: 4.2%. Ocular tolerance was similar for all groups. No treatment related adverse events were reported. Logistic regression analyses found prognostic factors such as: country (p<0.001) and trachoma severity (p = 0.003). Conclusions: In active trachoma, azithromycin eye drops twice daily for 2 or 3 days are as efficient as the WHO's reference treatment and represent an innovative alternative to oral azithromycin. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of ophthalmology. Volume 91:Issue 5(2007)
- Journal:
- British journal of ophthalmology
- Issue:
- Volume 91:Issue 5(2007)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 91, Issue 5 (2007)
- Year:
- 2007
- Volume:
- 91
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2007-0091-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 667
- Page End:
- 672
- Publication Date:
- 2006-09-27
- Subjects:
- GCP, good clinical practice -- ITT, intend to treat -- TF0, no active trachoma -- (TF+TI0), trachomatous inflammation − follicular -- (TF+TI), trachomatous inflammation − follicular and intense -- WHO, World Health Organisation
Ophthalmology -- Periodicals
617.7 - Journal URLs:
- http://bjo.bmj.com/ ↗
http://bjo.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bjo.2006.099275 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1161
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19705.xml