Is intraoperative enteroscopy still relevant in small bowel disorders in the era of capsule endoscopy and device‐assisted enteroscopy? Real‐world experience from a tertiary care hospital. Issue 11 (30th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pal, Partha; Tandan, Manu; Kulkarni, Sujay; Reddy, Palle Manohar; Ramchandani, Mohan; Sekaran, Anuradha; Shetty, Mahesh G; Rebala, Pradeep; Rao, G V; Reddy, D Nageshwar
• Is Part Of: Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. Volume 36:Issue 11(2021)
• Page Start: 3183
• Page End: 3190
• Publication Date: 2021-07-30
• Subjects: capsule endoscopy -- device‐assisted enteroscopy -- intraoperative enteroscopy -- small bowel endoscopy -- small intestinal bleeding; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Liver Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15626
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0815-9319

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aim: With the advent of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and device‐assisted enteroscopy (DAE), the indication of intraoperative enteroscopy (IOE) has become limited due to reported high morbidity/mortality. Most of the earlier studies on IOE were small/from pre‐VCE/DAE era. We aimed to evaluate the impact of IOE in management of small bowel disorders (SBD) in post‐VCE/DAE era. Methods: Patients with SBD undergoing IOE over last 15 years were evaluated retrospectively. Overall diagnostic/therapeutic yield, incremental diagnostic yield over preoperative investigations, and adverse events were noted. We also evaluated the number of cases in which IOE changed the management or guided surgical or endoscopic therapy. Rebleeding and recurrence were evaluated in patients with available follow‐up data. Results: A total of 89 patients (59 male, 9–82 years) were included in the study. Overall diagnostic and therapeutic yield were 92.1% and 85.4%, respectively. Common findings of IOE were benign ulcers/strictures (30.1%), vascular lesions (26%), diverticula (15.1%), and tumors (13.7%). A total of 49.4% (44/89), 36% (32/89), and 20.2% (18/89) underwent VCE, DAE, or both, respectively, before IOE. Incremental diagnostic yield over preoperative work‐up was 31.5% (28/89), and IOE changed the management in 37.1% (33/89) patients. IOE was used to guide surgery/endotherapy in 39.3% (35/89) patients. Recurrent gastrointestinal bleed occurred in 21.2% (14/66) patients. Morbidity and mortality rates were 20.2% (18/89) and 3.4% (3/89), respectively. Conclusions: Intraoperative enteroscopy remains an essential technique to evaluate SBD and can detect new and additional lesions even after extensive preoperative evaluation. IOE is useful in guiding therapy in preoperatively identified lesions and can change management in a substantial proportion of patients. Hence, IOE has a definitive role in post‐VCE/DAE era in carefully selected patients with SBD.