A Review of Spatial Causal Inference Methods for Environmental and Epidemiological Applications. (31st May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reich, Brian J.; Yang, Shu; Guan, Yawen; Giffin, Andrew B.; Miller, Matthew J.; Rappold, Ana
• Is Part Of: International statistical review. Volume 89:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: 605
• Page End: 634
• Publication Date: 2021-05-31
• Subjects: interference -- potential outcomes -- propensity scores -- spatial confounding -- spillover; Statistics -- Periodicals; Statistics -- Bibliography -- Periodicals; Statistics -- Bibliography; Statistics -- Periodicals; Statistique; Statistique -- Périodiques; Statistique -- Bibliographie -- Périodiques; Statistique -- Étude et enseignement -- Périodiques; Statistique -- Étude et enseignement -- Bibliographie -- Périodiques; Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); 519.2
• DOI: 10.1111/insr.12452
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-7734

Abstract

Summary: The scientific rigor and computational methods of causal inference have had great impacts on many disciplines but have only recently begun to take hold in spatial applications. Spatial causal inference poses analytic challenges due to complex correlation structures and interference between the treatment at one location and the outcomes at others. In this paper, we review the current literature on spatial causal inference and identify areas of future work. We first discuss methods that exploit spatial structure to account for unmeasured confounding variables. We then discuss causal analysis in the presence of spatial interference including several common assumptions used to reduce the complexity of the interference patterns under consideration. These methods are extended to the spatiotemporal case where we compare and contrast the potential outcomes framework with Granger causality and to geostatistical analyses involving spatial random fields of treatments and responses. The methods are introduced in the context of observational environmental and epidemiological studies and are compared using both a simulation study and analysis of the effect of ambient air pollution on COVID‐19 mortality rate. Code to implement many of the methods using the popular Bayesian software OpenBUGS is provided.