Initiating and integrating a personalized end of life care project in a community hospital intensive care unit: A qualitative study of clinician and implementation team perspectives. Issue 6 (26th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yeung, Eugenia; Sadowski, Laurie; Levesque, Kelsea; Camargo, Mercedes; Vo, Allen; Young, Elayn; Duan, Erick; Tsang, Jennifer L. Y.; Cook, Deborah; Tam, Benjamin
• Is Part Of: Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. Volume 27:Issue 6(2021)
• Page Start: 1281
• Page End: 1290
• Publication Date: 2021-01-26
• Subjects: intensive care -- end of life care -- implementation science -- patient‐centered care -- community hospitals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; 616.005
• DOI: 10.1111/jep.13538
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1356-1294

Abstract

Abstract: Rationale: The end of life (EOL) experience in the intensive care unit (ICU) can be psychologically distressing for patients, families, and clinicians. The 3 Wishes Project (3WP) personalizes the EOL experience by carrying out wishes for dying patients and their families. While the 3WP has been integrated in academic, tertiary care ICUs, implementing this project in a community ICU has yet to be described. Objectives: To examine facilitators of, and barriers to, implementing the 3WP in a community ICU from the clinician and implementation team perspective. Methods: This qualitative descriptive study evaluated the implementation of the 3WP in a 20‐bed community ICU in Southern Ontario, Canada. Patients were considered for the 3WP if they had a high likelihood of imminent death or planned withdrawal of life‐sustaining therapy. Following the qualitative descriptive approach, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with purposively sampled clinicians and implementation team. Data from transcribed interviews were analyzed in triplicate through qualitative content analysis. Results: Interviews with 12 participants indicated that the 3WP personalized and enriched the EOL experience. Interviewees indicated higher intensity education strategies were needed to enable spread as the project grew. Clinicians described many physical resources for the project but suggested more non‐clinical project support for orientation, continuing education, and data collection. A majority of wishes focused on physical resources including keepsakes, which helped facilitate project spread when clinician capacity was attenuated by competing duties. Conclusions: In this community hospital, ICU clinicians and implementation team members report perceived improved EOL care for patients, families, and clinicians following 3WP initiation and integration. Implementing individualized and meaningful wishes at EOL for dying patients in a community ICU requires adequate planning and time dedicated to optimizing clinician education. Adapting key features of an intervention to local expertise and capacity may facilitate spread during project initiation and integration.