Why is the literature on first impressions so focused on White faces?. Issue 9 (22nd September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cook, Richard; Over, Harriet
• Is Part Of: Royal Society open science. Volume 8:Issue 9(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-09-22
• Subjects: first impressions -- facial traits -- other-race effect -- racism -- inter-group bias; Science -- Periodicals; 500
• DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211146
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2054-5703

Abstract

Abstract : We spontaneously attribute to strangers a wide variety of character traits based on their facial appearance. While these first impressions have little or no basis in reality, they exert a strong influence over our behaviour. Cognitive scientists have revealed a great deal about first impressions from faces including their factor structure, the cues on which they are based, the neurocognitive mechanisms responsible, and their developmental trajectory. In this field, authors frequently strive to remove as much ethnic variability from stimulus sets as possible. Typically, this convention means that participants are asked to judge the likely traits of White faces only. In the present article, we consider four possible reasons for the lack of facial diversity in this literature and find that it is unjustified. Next, we illustrate how the focus on White faces has undermined scientific efforts to understand first impressions from faces and argue that it reinforces socially regressive ideas about 'race' and status. We go on to articulate our concern that opportunities may be lost to leverage the knowledge derived from the study of first impressions against the dire consequences of prejudice and discrimination. Finally, we highlight some promising developments in the field.