Randomised prospective trial to assess the clinical utility of multianalyte assay panel with complement activation products for the diagnosis of SLE. Issue 1 (19th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wallace, Daniel J; Alexander, Roberta Vezza; O'Malley, Tyler; Khosroshahi, Arezou; Hojjati, Mehrnaz; Loupasakis, Konstantinos; Alper, Jeffrey; Sherrer, Yvonne; Fondal, Maria; Kataria, Rajesh; Powell, Tami; Ibarra, Claudia; Narain, Sonali; Massarotti, Elena; Weinstein, Arthur; Dervieux, Thierry
• Is Part Of: Lupus science & medicine. Volume 6:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-09-19
• Subjects: systemic lupus erythematosus -- clinical utility -- laboratory test -- diagnosis; Systemic lupus erythematosus -- Periodicals; 616.772005
• DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000349
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-8851

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: We compared the physician-assessed diagnostic likelihood of SLE resulting from standard diagnosis laboratory testing (SDLT) to that resulting from multianalyte assay panel (MAP) with cell-bound complement activation products (MAP/CB-CAPs), which reports a two-tiered index test result having 80% sensitivity and 86% specificity for SLE. Methods: Patients (n=145) with a history of positive antinuclear antibody status were evaluated clinically by rheumatologists and randomised to SDLT arm (tests ordered at the discretion of the rheumatologists) or to MAP/CB-CAPs testing arm. The primary endpoint was based on the change in the physician likelihood of SLE on a five-point Likert scale collected before and after testing. Changes in pharmacological treatment based on laboratory results were assessed in both arms. Statistical analysis consisted of Wilcoxon and Fisher's exact tests. Results: At enrolment, patients randomised to SDLT (n=73, age=48±2 years, 94% females) and MAP/CB-CAPs testing arms (n=72, 50±2 years, 93% females) presented with similar pretest likelihood of SLE (1.42±0.06 vs 1.46±0.06 points, respectively; p=0.68). Post-test likelihood of SLE resulting from randomisation in the MAP/CB-CAPs testing arm was significantly lower than that resulting from randomisation to SDLT arm on review of test results (−0.44±0.10 points vs −0.19±0.07 points) and at the 12-week follow-up visit (−0.61±0.10 points vs −0.31±0.10 points) (p<0.05). Among patients randomised to the MAP/CB-CAPs testing arm, two-tiered positive test results associated significantly with initiation of prednisone (p=0.034). C onclusion: Our data suggest that MAP/CB-CAPs testing has clinical utility in facilitating SLE diagnosis and treatment decisions.