Comparative safety of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 1 (1st February 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparative safety of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 1 (1st February 2019)
- Main Title:
- Comparative safety of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Donnan, Jennifer R
Grandy, Catherine A
Chibrikov, Eugene
Marra, Carlo A
Aubrey-Bassler, Kris
Johnston, Karissa
Swab, Michelle
Hache, Jenna
Curnew, Daniel
Nguyen, Hai
Gamble, John-Michael - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To estimate the association between the use of sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and postmarket harms as identified by drug regulatory agencies. Design: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT). Six large databases were searched from inception to May 2018. Random effects models were used to estimate pooled relative risks (RRs). Intervention: SGLT2 inhibitors, compared with placebo or active comparators. Primary outcomes: Acute kidney injury (AKI), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), urinary tract infections (UTI), bone fractures and lower limb amputations. Results: We screened 2418 citations of which 109 were included. Most studies included one of four SGLT2 inhibitors, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, empagliflozin and ipragliflozin. When compared with placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors were found to be significantly protective against AKI (RR=0.59; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.89; I 2 =0.0%), while no difference was found for DKA (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.30 to 1.45, I 2 =0.0%), UTI (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.09, I 2 =0.0%) or bone fracture (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.09, I 2 =1.3%). Three studies reported on amputation, with one finding a significant increase risk. No increased risk for either outcome was found when compared with active controls. Subgroup analysis did show an increased risk of UTI with dapagliflozin only (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.43, I 2 =0.0%), but no other analysis supported an increased risk of AKI, DKA,Abstract : Objective: To estimate the association between the use of sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and postmarket harms as identified by drug regulatory agencies. Design: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT). Six large databases were searched from inception to May 2018. Random effects models were used to estimate pooled relative risks (RRs). Intervention: SGLT2 inhibitors, compared with placebo or active comparators. Primary outcomes: Acute kidney injury (AKI), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), urinary tract infections (UTI), bone fractures and lower limb amputations. Results: We screened 2418 citations of which 109 were included. Most studies included one of four SGLT2 inhibitors, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, empagliflozin and ipragliflozin. When compared with placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors were found to be significantly protective against AKI (RR=0.59; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.89; I 2 =0.0%), while no difference was found for DKA (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.30 to 1.45, I 2 =0.0%), UTI (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.09, I 2 =0.0%) or bone fracture (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.09, I 2 =1.3%). Three studies reported on amputation, with one finding a significant increase risk. No increased risk for either outcome was found when compared with active controls. Subgroup analysis did show an increased risk of UTI with dapagliflozin only (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.43, I 2 =0.0%), but no other analysis supported an increased risk of AKI, DKA, UTI or fracture. Conclusions: Current evidence from RCTs does not suggest an increased risk of harm with SGLT2 inhibitors as a class over placebo or active comparators with respect to AKI, DKA, UTI or fracture. However, wide CIs for many comparisons suggest limited precision, and therefore clinically important adverse events cannot be ruled out. Dapagliflozin, appears to independently increase the risk of UTI, although the mechanism for this intraclass variation in risk is unclear. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42016038715. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 1(2019)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 1(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0009-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-02-01
- Subjects:
- epidemiology -- therapeutics -- adverse events
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022577 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19661.xml