Unheard vulnerability discourses from Tarai-Madhesh, Nepal. Issue 126 (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clement, Floriane; Sugden, Fraser
• Is Part Of: Geoforum. Issue 126(2021)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 79
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Vulnerability -- Farmers -- Participatory video -- Discourses -- Nepal; Geography -- Periodicals; Human geography -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Periodicals; Sciences de la terre -- Périodiques; Géographie -- Périodiques; Géographie humaine -- Périodiques; Aménagement du territoire -- Périodiques; Earth sciences; Geography; Human geography; Regional planning; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 304.205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-7185

Abstract

Highlights: We use participatory video to explore local vulnerability discourses in Nepal. Local discourses highlight the structural factors causing vulnerability. Local vulnerability discourses challenge neoliberal policy assumptions. Research findings evidence both knowledge co-production and performance. The context in which knowledge on vulnerability is produced and performed matters. Abstract: Climate change has produced new knowledge production systems, heavily dominated by global discourses, institutions and values. Scholars have long called for integrating local knowledge in the design and implementation of climate change adaptation policy responses. Yet integrating local knowledges requires addressing issues related with power and authority, and critically examining which knowledge counts and at which scale. In this regard, a relatively under-explored research area is to assess how local representations and experiences of vulnerability fit with or disrupt dominant policy discourses. This is the focus of our study, conducted in the Tarai-Madhesh region of Nepal. We relied on an original methodology, combining participatory video research with a discourse analysis of national policy documents and of the films produced by farmers. Our analysis shows that farmers' discourses appear on the surface congruent with some features of national policy story-lines. Yet their underlying narratives seriously challenge several core assumptions of national and international climate change adaptation policies, rooted in ecological modernization, technocentrism and neoliberalism. This seeming contradiction indicates both knowledge co-production and performance, underlying the need to closely understand the context in which local knowledges on climate change vulnerability are produced. We conclude with a few promising research areas to explore strategies to increase the authority of local knowledge into political arenas across scales.