Beyond vision loss: the independent impact of diabetic retinopathy on vision-related quality of life in a Chinese Singaporean population. Issue 9 (25th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fenwick, Eva K; Man, Ryan E K; Gan, Alfred Tau Liang; Kumari, Neelam; Wong, Charlene; Aravindhan, Amudha; Gupta, Preeti; Wang, Jie Jin; Mitchell, Paul; Wong, Tien Yin; Cheng, Ching-Yu; Lamoureux, Ecosse Luc
• Is Part Of: British journal of ophthalmology. Volume 103:Issue 9(2019)
• Page Start: 1314
• Page End: 1319
• Publication Date: 2018-10-25
• Subjects: diabetic retinopathy -- quality of life -- emotional well-being -- vision-specific functioning -- vision impairment; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 617.7
• DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313082
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1161

Abstract

Abstract : Background/aims: To assess the independent impact of diabetic retinopathy (DR) on three domains of vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in a Chinese Singapore population. Methods: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study (n=3353; 2009–2011) was a population-based, prospective, cross-sectional study conducted at the Singapore Eye Research Institute. The study population included 292 adults with diabetes, with and without DR. DR (better eye) was categorised as presence and absence of any DR; severity of DR (no vision-threatening DR (VTDR); severe non-proliferative DR (NPDR); PDR and/or clinically significant macular oedema and VTDR). Our main outcome was VRQoL which was measured using Rasch-calibrated scores from the 'Reading', 'Mobility' and 'Emotional' domains of the Impact of Vision Impairment questionnaire. The relationship between DR and VRQoL was assessed using multiple linear regression models. Results: Of the 292 individuals (mean age 61.35 ± 9.66 years; 55.8% male), 201 (68.8%), 49 (16.8%), 20 (6.8%), 22 (7.5%) and 27 (9.2%) had no DR, minimal-mild NPDR, moderate-severe NPDR, PDR and VTDR, respectively. Any DR and VTDR were independently associated with 6% and 12% worse Reading scores and 7% and 18% poorer Emotional well-being, respectively, compared with those without DR. These associations persisted after separate adjustment for visual impairment and presenting visual acuity. No significant difference was found in the Mobility domain between persons with and without DR. Conclusions: We documented that DR, particularly VTDR, was independently associated with restrictions in Reading and Emotional well-being. Understanding factors underlying the detrimental DR-VRQoL relationship may optimise rehabilitation outcomes for individuals with DR.