Analysis of the Positional Relationship Among the Operator, Camera, and Monitor: Overcoming the Difficulties of Mirror-image Conditions During Laparoscopic Surgery. Issue 5 (23rd October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Inagaki, Yuriko; Kawai, Kazushige; Nishikawa, Takeshi; Ishii, Hiroaki; Emoto, Shigenobu; Murono, Koji; Kaneko, Manabu; Sasaki, Kazuhito; Nozawa, Hiroaki; Ishihara, Soichiro
• Is Part Of: Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. Volume 31:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: 513
• Page End: 518
• Publication Date: 2021-10-23
• Subjects: laparoscopic training -- mirror-image -- colorectal cancer -- training method; Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Endoscopy -- Periodicals; Laparoscopy -- Periodicals; 617.550597
• DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000955
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1530-4515

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Abstract : Background: Although methods to overcome difficulties associated with mirror-image conditions have been investigated, the ideal spatial relationship among the operator line of sight, monitor location, and camera location remains unclear. Moreover, the best training method for improving laparoscopic surgical skills under varying operator line of sight, camera, and monitor positions is unknown. We aimed to investigate the role of laparoscopic training under mirror-image conditions in improving surgical efficiency and whether prior surgical experience affects such training. Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the Department of Surgical Oncology, Tokyo University, Japan. Twenty-five surgeons participated. Novice (n=14), trained (n=7), and expert (n=4) participants performed the simulated task in a box trainer while varying the positional relationships among the surgeons, camera, and monitor. Five patterns were repeatedly performed 5 times per day for 4 days over 2 weeks. Results: The most significant differences in terms of the time required to complete the task under mirror-image conditions among the 3 groups were on day 1 (novices: 185.8 s, trained: 79.7 s, and experts: 46.5 s, P= 0.009). However, after 4 days of training, the corresponding times did not differ among the 3 groups (26.0, 30.7, and 23.1 s, respectively; P= 0.415). Laparoscopic training was sufficiently effective under mirror-image conditions. Conclusions: Mirror-image surgical conditions provided the most difficult setting, because surgeons and assistants often became disoriented, and task performance was most degraded. However, just 4 days of training was found to be sufficient to overcome the difficulties encountered while performing laparoscopic procedures under mirror-image conditions.