A comprehensive review of microwave application on the oil shale: Prospects for shale oil production. (1st December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Taheri-Shakib, Jaber; Kantzas, Apostolos
• Is Part Of: Fuel. Volume 305(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-12-01
• Subjects: Oil shale -- Microwave heating -- Conventional heating -- Shale oil upgrading -- Pyrolysis; Fuel -- Periodicals; Coal -- Periodicals; Coal; Fuel; Periodicals; 662.6
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121519
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-2361

Abstract

Highlights: Microwave irradiation has a distinct impact and efficiency on shale oil production. Microwave heating acts as a more efficient and effective method in the shale oil upgrading process. Heating rate is one of the leading and influential factors in the oil shale pyrolysis. Abstract: This study reviews the mechanism of microwave irradiation and the affecting parameters, including heating rate, particle size, catalysts, and supercritical fluids on the microwave induced pyrolysis of oil shales. The factors influencing shale oil upgrading using microwave and conventional heating were analyzed. Although shale ash induces secondary cracking in conventional heating, followed by cracking of heavy compounds and increased light oil and pyrolysis gas, the corresponding mechanism in microwave heating has not yet been studied. The shale ash composition and particle size play a vital role in conventional heating efficiency. Increasing oil shale particles size in conventional heating after reaching the maximum converted shale oil reduces produced oil due to increased heat transfer and volatile diffusion in oil shale grains and induction of secondary cracking, which leads to the intensification of shale oil upgrading. Catalysts with high microwave absorption capacity, such as iron powder, remove higher percentages of sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen from shale oil in microwave pyrolysis as compared to conventional heating. The presence of zeolite in microwave pyrolysis causes better and more effective shale oil upgrading by reducing C10 -C16, >C16, naphtha fraction, and increasing kerosene fraction compared to conventional pyrolysis. The presence of water increases polycyclic aromatics, increases the concentration of alkene fraction and decreases asphaltene and coke formed by solvation or caging of shale oil molecules. The presence of nitrogen and hydrogen in conventional pyrolysis reduces desulfurization and upgraded shale oil yield, respectively. A sharp increase in the heating rate in conventional and microwave pyrolysis reduces shale oil yield. In conventional heating, increasing heating rate decreases the hydrogen (H)/ carbon (C) ratio, and the nitrogen and sulfur fractions increase due to the nature of chemical bonding with hydrocarbons and its entangled with metal oxides. In microwave pyrolysis at high heating rates, the H/C ratio increases and the amounts of nitrogen and sulfur in shale oil decrease sharply. The high microwave radiation power facilitates the removal of nitrogen and sulfur that is much higher than conventional pyrolysis. The conversion of pyrite to pyrrhotite in oil shales that have a high microwave absorption capacity increases microwave pyrolysis efficiency. The calcite and feldspar also improve this process because they participate in the pyrolysis process, and their amounts are reduced in the spent shale. Thus, the oil produced from oil shales under the microwave pyrolysis process has lighter and higher quality compounds. However, the broad applications of this technology in the use of oil shales are still unclear and more studies should be done to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of using microwave heating in oil shales. Further study and research are required to develop microwave technology in oil shale, and based on its potentials, it can be introduced as a new and efficient method in oil shale production.