Investigation of single-shot beam quality measurements using state of the art solid-state dosimeters for routine quality assurance applications in mammography. (August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Investigation of single-shot beam quality measurements using state of the art solid-state dosimeters for routine quality assurance applications in mammography. (August 2021)
- Main Title:
- Investigation of single-shot beam quality measurements using state of the art solid-state dosimeters for routine quality assurance applications in mammography
- Authors:
- Bemelmans, Frédéric
Marshall, Nicholas W.
Dedulle, An
Tri Wigati, Kristina
Ivanovic, Sonja
Binst, Joke
Struelens, Lara
De Hauwere, An
Devillers, Magali
Bosmans, Hilde - Abstract:
- Highlights: Medical physicists should verify new dosimetry devices for the conditions during any physics tests. The energy response of tested solid state dosimeters was excellent (25kVp-32kVp). Tested solid state dosimeters are trustworthy for routine QA purposes (output-HVL). Abstract: Purpose: To assess if single shot acquisitions with solid-state dosimeters as well as Robson's method could replace ionization chambers for tube output and HVL measurements, saving medical physicists time. Material and methods: The energy responses of 4 solid-state dosimeters with automatic calculation of HVL were compared to ionization chamber measurements. Five anode/filter combinations were tested: Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh, W/Rh and W/Ag, from 24kVp to 35kVp. Tube output was measured free in air. HVL was measured using the solid-state dosimeters (single-shot acquisition), then manually with aluminum sheets and finally using the parametrization method of Robson. Results: Deviations in tube output and HVL related to energy response in SSD were small in the 25–32 kVp range, and for tube output typically within 3%. Extrapolation using the Robson parametrization was within 5%, except for one device and for all W/Rh. Deviations of the HVL using the single shot approach were within 10% of the gold standard data. Larger deviations were found at the extreme tube voltages of 24kVp and 35kVp (maximum of 24%). Conclusion: With the assumption that deviations in tube output of 5% and for HVL of 10% areHighlights: Medical physicists should verify new dosimetry devices for the conditions during any physics tests. The energy response of tested solid state dosimeters was excellent (25kVp-32kVp). Tested solid state dosimeters are trustworthy for routine QA purposes (output-HVL). Abstract: Purpose: To assess if single shot acquisitions with solid-state dosimeters as well as Robson's method could replace ionization chambers for tube output and HVL measurements, saving medical physicists time. Material and methods: The energy responses of 4 solid-state dosimeters with automatic calculation of HVL were compared to ionization chamber measurements. Five anode/filter combinations were tested: Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, Rh/Rh, W/Rh and W/Ag, from 24kVp to 35kVp. Tube output was measured free in air. HVL was measured using the solid-state dosimeters (single-shot acquisition), then manually with aluminum sheets and finally using the parametrization method of Robson. Results: Deviations in tube output and HVL related to energy response in SSD were small in the 25–32 kVp range, and for tube output typically within 3%. Extrapolation using the Robson parametrization was within 5%, except for one device and for all W/Rh. Deviations of the HVL using the single shot approach were within 10% of the gold standard data. Larger deviations were found at the extreme tube voltages of 24kVp and 35kVp (maximum of 24%). Conclusion: With the assumption that deviations in tube output of 5% and for HVL of 10% are acceptable, all tested solid state dosimeters met this criterion in the tube voltage range of 26kVp to 32kVp. Robson's method worked well for the spectra for which the method was developed, making both alternative approaches trustworthy for routine quality assurance purposes. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physica medica. Volume 88(2021)
- Journal:
- Physica medica
- Issue:
- Volume 88(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 88, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 88
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0088-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- 242
- Page End:
- 249
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08
- Subjects:
- Solid-state dosimeters -- Energy response -- Half value layer -- Digital mammography
Medical physics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques
Physique -- Périodiques
Médecine -- Périodiques
610.153 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.physicamedica.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1120-1797
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6475.070000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19603.xml