Comparison of three scales (BIS, SUMD and BCIS) for measuring insight dimensions and their evolution after one-year of follow-up: Findings from the FACE-SZ Cohort. (September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of three scales (BIS, SUMD and BCIS) for measuring insight dimensions and their evolution after one-year of follow-up: Findings from the FACE-SZ Cohort. (September 2021)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of three scales (BIS, SUMD and BCIS) for measuring insight dimensions and their evolution after one-year of follow-up: Findings from the FACE-SZ Cohort
- Authors:
- Capdevielle, Delphine
Norton, Joanna
Aouizerate, Bruno
Berna, Fabrice
Chereau, Isabelle
D'Amato, Thierry
Dubertret, Caroline
Dubreucq, Julien
Fond, Guillaume
C, Lançon
Mallet, Jasmina
Misdrahi, David
Passerieux, Catherine
Rey, Romain
Schurhoff, Franck
Urbach, Mathieu
Llorca, Pierre-Michel
Raffard, Stéphane
Aouizerate, B.
Berna, F.
Blanc, O.
Capdevielle, D.
Chereau-Boudet, I.
Coulon, N.
D'Amato, T.
Dorey, J.M.
Dubertret, C.
Fond, G.
Gabayet, F.
Lacelle, D.
Lançon, C.
Laouamri, H.
Leboyer, M.
Llorca, P.M.
Mallet, J.
Metairie, E.
Misdrahi, D.
Passerieux, C.
Pignon, B.
Peri, P.
Portalier, C.
Rey, R.
Roman, C.
Schürhoff, F.
Szöke, A.
Urbach, M.
Zinetti-Bertschy, A.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Highlights: Few studies have compared self-report measures and clinician-rated instruments for clinical insight and cognitive insight. The natural course of insight and its different measures are poorly understood. Good overall agreement between the two clinical insight instruments was found. Agreement between cognitive and clinical insight was moderate. The evolution of cognitive insight was not congruent with clinical insight evolution. Abstract: The aim of our study was to compare the performance of three different instruments measuring clinical and cognitive dimensions of insight. Data on 182 outpatients with schizophrenia and one-year follow-up assessments was drawn from the FACE-SZ cohort. Awareness of clinical state (« clinical insight ») was measured using both a clinician-rated measure (the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD)), and a self-report measure (the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS). Cognitive insight was measured using a self-report measure (the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)). For each scale, change in insight was examined at the follow-up. Correlations between SUMD and BIS subscales measuring same dimensions were significant. BIS-BCIS correlations were weak for all combinations except between BIS illness dimension and BCIS composite score. At the follow-up, BIS and SUMD awareness of treatment need improved whereas illness and symptom awareness increased only on the SUMD. Conversely, cognitive insight composite scores decreased. DespiteHighlights: Few studies have compared self-report measures and clinician-rated instruments for clinical insight and cognitive insight. The natural course of insight and its different measures are poorly understood. Good overall agreement between the two clinical insight instruments was found. Agreement between cognitive and clinical insight was moderate. The evolution of cognitive insight was not congruent with clinical insight evolution. Abstract: The aim of our study was to compare the performance of three different instruments measuring clinical and cognitive dimensions of insight. Data on 182 outpatients with schizophrenia and one-year follow-up assessments was drawn from the FACE-SZ cohort. Awareness of clinical state (« clinical insight ») was measured using both a clinician-rated measure (the Scale to assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder (SUMD)), and a self-report measure (the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS). Cognitive insight was measured using a self-report measure (the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)). For each scale, change in insight was examined at the follow-up. Correlations between SUMD and BIS subscales measuring same dimensions were significant. BIS-BCIS correlations were weak for all combinations except between BIS illness dimension and BCIS composite score. At the follow-up, BIS and SUMD awareness of treatment need improved whereas illness and symptom awareness increased only on the SUMD. Conversely, cognitive insight composite scores decreased. Despite relatively good overall agreement between the two clinical insight instruments, considerable variability for similar insight dimensions measured by different instruments was found. Agreement between cognitive and clinical insight is moderate. Our study strengthens the argument that insight is harder to operationalize than other symptoms and may explain why it is so seldom explicitly targeted in schizophrenia treatment. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Psychiatry research. Volume 303(2021)
- Journal:
- Psychiatry research
- Issue:
- Volume 303(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 303, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 303
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0303-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09
- Subjects:
- Schizophrenia -- Insight -- Clinical Insight -- Cognitive Insight
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Psychiatry -- periodicals
Psychiatrie -- Périodiques
616.89 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01651781 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114044 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0165-1781
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6946.263700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19609.xml