The past, present, and future of selection history. (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anderson, Brian A.; Kim, Haena; Kim, Andy J.; Liao, Ming-Ray; Mrkonja, Lana; Clement, Andrew; Grégoire, Laurent
• Is Part Of: Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. Volume 130(2021)
• Page Start: 326
• Page End: 350
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Selective attention -- Attentional capture -- Associative learning -- Habit learning -- Selection history; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Human behavior -- Periodicals; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Behavior -- Periodicals; Ethology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiologie -- Périodiques; Comportement humain -- Périodiques; Animaux -- Mœurs et comportement -- Périodiques; Neurologie -- Périodiques; Animal behavior; Human behavior; Neurology; Psychophysiology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 573.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0149-7634

Abstract

Highlights: Selection history influences the control of attention. What constitutes selection history in the control of attention is multifaceted. We offer a formal definition of selection history. We explore how different components of selection history influence attention. We conclude with an integrative theory of selection history. Abstract: The last ten years of attention research have witnessed a revolution, replacing a theoretical dichotomy (top-down vs. bottom-up control) with a trichotomy (biased by current goals, physical salience, and selection history). This third new mechanism of attentional control, selection history, is multifaceted. Some aspects of selection history must be learned over time whereas others reflect much more transient influences. A variety of different learning experiences can shape the attention system, including reward, aversive outcomes, past experience searching for a target, target‒non-target relations, and more. In this review, we provide an overview of the historical forces that led to the proposal of selection history as a distinct mechanism of attentional control. We then propose a formal definition of selection history, with concrete criteria, and identify different components of experience-driven attention that fit within this definition. The bulk of the review is devoted to exploring how these different components relate to one another. We conclude by proposing an integrative account of selection history centered on underlying themes that emerge from our review.