Identifying flares in rheumatoid arthritis: reliability and construct validation of the OMERACT RA Flare Core Domain Set. Issue 1 (26th May 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Identifying flares in rheumatoid arthritis: reliability and construct validation of the OMERACT RA Flare Core Domain Set. Issue 1 (26th May 2016)
- Main Title:
- Identifying flares in rheumatoid arthritis: reliability and construct validation of the OMERACT RA Flare Core Domain Set
- Authors:
- Bykerk, Vivian P
Bingham, Clifton O
Choy, Ernest H
Lin, Daming
Alten, Rieke
Christensen, Robin
Furst, Daniel E
Hewlett, Sarah
Leong, Amye
March, Lyn
Woodworth, Thasia
Boire, Gilles
Haraoui, Boulos
Hitchon, Carol
Jamal, Shahin
Keystone, Edward C
Pope, Janet
Tin, Diane
Thorne, J Carter
Bartlett, Susan J - Other Names:
- author non-byline.
Boonen Annelies author non-byline.
Broeder Alfons den author non-byline.
Fautrel Bruno author non-byline.
Guillemin Francis author non-byline.
Lyddiatt Anne author non-byline.
May James E. author non-byline.
Montie Pam author non-byline.
Orbai Ana-Maria author non-byline.
Pohl Christoph author non-byline.
Voshaar Marieke Scholte author non-byline.
Ahluwalia Vandana author non-byline.
Akhavan Pooneh author non-byline.
Baron Murray author non-byline.
Bensen William author non-byline.
Bessette Louis author non-byline.
Boire Gilles author non-byline.
Bykerk Vivian author non-byline.
Colmegna Ines author non-byline.
Haraoui Boulos author non-byline.
Hitchon Carol author non-byline.
Jamal Shahin author non-byline.
Keystone Edward author non-byline.
Kinkhoff Alice author non-byline.
Kraishi Majed author non-byline.
Larche Maggie author non-byline.
Lyddell Chris author non-byline.
Nair Bindu author non-byline.
Penney Chris author non-byline.
Pope Janet author non-byline.
Rubin Laurence author non-byline.
Thorne Carter author non-byline.
Zummer Michel author non-byline.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To evaluate the reliability of concurrent flare identification using 3 methods (patient, rheumatologist and Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 criteria), and construct validity of candidate items representing the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) RA Flare Core Domain Set. Methods: Candidate flare questions and legacy measures were administered at consecutive visits to Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) patients between November 2011 and November 2014. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set indicators were recorded. Concordance to identify flares was assessed using the agreement coefficient. Construct validity of flare questions was examined: convergent (Spearman's r); discriminant (mean differences between flaring/non-flaring patients); and consequential (proportions with prior treatment reductions and intended therapeutic change postflare). Results: The 849 patients were 75% female, 81% white, 42% were in remission/low disease activity (R/LDA), and 16–32% were flaring at the second visit. Agreement of flare status was low–strong (κ's 0.17–0.88) and inversely related to RA disease activity level. Flare domains correlated highly (r's≥0.70) with each other, patient global (r's≥0.66) and corresponding measures (r's 0.49–0.92); and moderately highly with MD and patient-reported joint counts (r's 0.29–0.62). When MD/patients agreed the patient was flaring, mean flare domain between-group differences were 2.1–3.0; 36%Abstract : Objective: To evaluate the reliability of concurrent flare identification using 3 methods (patient, rheumatologist and Disease Activity Score (DAS)28 criteria), and construct validity of candidate items representing the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) RA Flare Core Domain Set. Methods: Candidate flare questions and legacy measures were administered at consecutive visits to Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) patients between November 2011 and November 2014. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core set indicators were recorded. Concordance to identify flares was assessed using the agreement coefficient. Construct validity of flare questions was examined: convergent (Spearman's r); discriminant (mean differences between flaring/non-flaring patients); and consequential (proportions with prior treatment reductions and intended therapeutic change postflare). Results: The 849 patients were 75% female, 81% white, 42% were in remission/low disease activity (R/LDA), and 16–32% were flaring at the second visit. Agreement of flare status was low–strong (κ's 0.17–0.88) and inversely related to RA disease activity level. Flare domains correlated highly (r's≥0.70) with each other, patient global (r's≥0.66) and corresponding measures (r's 0.49–0.92); and moderately highly with MD and patient-reported joint counts (r's 0.29–0.62). When MD/patients agreed the patient was flaring, mean flare domain between-group differences were 2.1–3.0; 36% had treatment reductions prior to flare, with escalation planned in 61%. Conclusions: Flares are common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are often preceded by treatment reductions. Patient/MD/DAS agreement of flare status is highest in patients worsening from R/LDA. OMERACT RA flare questions can discriminate between patients with/without flare and have strong evidence of construct and consequential validity. Ongoing work will identify optimal scoring and cut points to identify RA flares. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- RMD open. Volume 2:Issue 1(2016)
- Journal:
- RMD open
- Issue:
- Volume 2:Issue 1(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0002-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-05-26
- Subjects:
- Rheumatoid Arthritis -- Outcomes research -- Disease Activity -- Patient perspective
Musculoskeletal system -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.7005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://rmdopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000225 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2056-5933
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19600.xml