Feasibility and potential acceptability of three cervical barriers among vulnerable young women in Zimbabwe. Issue 1 (1st January 2010)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Feasibility and potential acceptability of three cervical barriers among vulnerable young women in Zimbabwe. Issue 1 (1st January 2010)
- Main Title:
- Feasibility and potential acceptability of three cervical barriers among vulnerable young women in Zimbabwe
- Authors:
- van der Straten, Ariane
Sahin-Hodoglugil, Nuriye
Clouse, Kate
Mtetwa, Sibongile
Chirenje, Mike Z - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: We explored the potential acceptability of three cervical barriers (CB) (Ortho All-Flex® diaphragm, SILCS® diaphragm, FemCap TM cervical cap) among sexually experienced Zimbabwean young women. Methods: Forty-five young women (aged 16–21 years) received an individual CB educational session. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of the three CBs in a 1:1:1 ratio, and practised insertion and removal of their device at the clinic. Next, participants were interviewed on their practice experiences, and their post-practice attitudes towards CB. Results: All 45 young women were willing and able to insert their assigned device. The majority reported "easy" insertion and removal and 93% "liked" the device they tried. All showed interest in participating in future CB studies: when asked which device they would like to try in the future, over half (58%) chose SILCS, regardless of the device they had tried. The majority felt comfortable touching their genitals to insert/remove the CB and most participants favoured methods' attributes associated with female-control and non-interference with sex. Over half the participants said they would prefer to use a CB continuously compared to episodic use. Two-thirds of them expressed interest in CB for dual protection. Conclusion: The concept of CB, and initial insertion experience, were well accepted in this selected, small group of Zimbabwean young women. Evaluating CB in larger studies seems feasible in thisAbstract : Background: We explored the potential acceptability of three cervical barriers (CB) (Ortho All-Flex® diaphragm, SILCS® diaphragm, FemCap TM cervical cap) among sexually experienced Zimbabwean young women. Methods: Forty-five young women (aged 16–21 years) received an individual CB educational session. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of the three CBs in a 1:1:1 ratio, and practised insertion and removal of their device at the clinic. Next, participants were interviewed on their practice experiences, and their post-practice attitudes towards CB. Results: All 45 young women were willing and able to insert their assigned device. The majority reported "easy" insertion and removal and 93% "liked" the device they tried. All showed interest in participating in future CB studies: when asked which device they would like to try in the future, over half (58%) chose SILCS, regardless of the device they had tried. The majority felt comfortable touching their genitals to insert/remove the CB and most participants favoured methods' attributes associated with female-control and non-interference with sex. Over half the participants said they would prefer to use a CB continuously compared to episodic use. Two-thirds of them expressed interest in CB for dual protection. Conclusion: The concept of CB, and initial insertion experience, were well accepted in this selected, small group of Zimbabwean young women. Evaluating CB in larger studies seems feasible in this population. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of family planning and reproductive health care. Volume 36:Issue 1(2010)
- Journal:
- Journal of family planning and reproductive health care
- Issue:
- Volume 36:Issue 1(2010)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 36, Issue 1 (2010)
- Year:
- 2010
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2010-0036-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 13
- Page End:
- 19
- Publication Date:
- 2010-01-01
- Subjects:
- acceptability -- cervical barrier method -- contraception -- HIV prevention -- young women
Birth control -- Periodicals
Contraception -- Periodicals
Reproductive health -- Periodicals
613.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ffp/jfp ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1783/147118910790290966 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1471-1893
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19571.xml