Baseline concussion symptom report in college athletes: comparison of scores on SCAT2 versus impact. Issue 5 (11th March 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lebrun, Constance M; Mrazik, Martin; Matthews-White, Joan; Lemke, Nicole; Naidu., Dhiren
• Is Part Of: British journal of sports medicine. Volume 47:Issue 5(2013)
• Page Start: e1
• Page End: e1
• Publication Date: 2013-03-11
• Subjects: Sports medicine -- Periodicals; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092101.16
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-3674

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To investigate differences between baseline self-report of concussion symptoms with two commonly used concussion assessment tools. Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional. Setting: University of Alberta. Subjects: One hundred and ninety-four varsity athletes (117 males; 77 females). Intervention: Prior to the competitive season, subjects completed baseline testing, including self-report of concussion symptoms, with the Subjective Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT2) and the on-line computerised Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment of Cognition (ImPACT) test, under supervision of an athletic therapist. Testing was counterbalanced to control for serial position effect. Outcome Measures: The 18 shared self-report concussion symptoms were compared, and a general linear model used to identify possible interactions between gender and group type (SCAT2 vs ImPACT). Finally correlations were calculated. Results: There was an interaction between gender and group type for 1 symptom (trouble falling asleep). Surprisingly, pairwise comparisons identified differences (p≤ 0.05) on 10/18 paired symptoms, with correlations ranging from 0.08 to 0.58. Conclusions: Subjects respond differently when self-reporting concussion symptoms, depending on type of instrument used, and mode of administration. Despite test items being similar in content, there are significant differences in symptom reports in the same subject between SCAT2 and ImPACT tests. Use of similar data collection methods for baseline testing, assessment post-injury and prior to return-to-play is indicated, to increase both the diagnostic and prognostic utility of such tests. This further emphasises current recommendations that these tests not be used in isolation to make therapeutic decisions regarding athletes with concussion; and underscores the importance of serial clinical evaluations by a suitably qualified physician. Competing interests: None. All authors have signed the disclosure form.