Choosing an optimal motor-task difficulty is not trivial: The influence of age and expertise. (November 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Choosing an optimal motor-task difficulty is not trivial: The influence of age and expertise. (November 2021)
- Main Title:
- Choosing an optimal motor-task difficulty is not trivial: The influence of age and expertise
- Authors:
- Schaefer, Sabine
Ohlinger, Christian
Frisch, Nicole - Abstract:
- Abstract: An accurate estimate of one's performance is an important prerequisite for success, and prevents people from taking excessive risks. Based on the selection-margins paradigm (Riediger et al., 2006), the current paper assessed maximum speed rope-skipping (study 1), soccer dribbling (study 2), and the fine motor task of tracing (study 3) in 5- to 37-year-olds. Participants predicted their performances for the upcoming trial. The better the predicted performance, the more points were gained in case of success. To discourage overestimations, participants received no points for unsuccessful trials. In rope skipping, older and more experienced athletes outperformed the beginners, and had fewer trials with 0 points. In soccer dribbling and tracing, older individuals again showed less overestimation, as reflected by a smaller deviation of predicted and actual performance (selection margins) and fewer 0 point trials. Athletes and coaches should be aware that younger and less-experienced athletes tend to overestimate their motor performances. Highlights: An accurate estimation of one's performance is important for success. We asked children, teenagers and young adults to accurately predict their performances in rope skipping, soccer, and tracing. The deviation of predicted and actual performances are operationalized as "selection margins". Younger individuals overestimated their performances. Future research should investigate the influence of chronological age and expertiseAbstract: An accurate estimate of one's performance is an important prerequisite for success, and prevents people from taking excessive risks. Based on the selection-margins paradigm (Riediger et al., 2006), the current paper assessed maximum speed rope-skipping (study 1), soccer dribbling (study 2), and the fine motor task of tracing (study 3) in 5- to 37-year-olds. Participants predicted their performances for the upcoming trial. The better the predicted performance, the more points were gained in case of success. To discourage overestimations, participants received no points for unsuccessful trials. In rope skipping, older and more experienced athletes outperformed the beginners, and had fewer trials with 0 points. In soccer dribbling and tracing, older individuals again showed less overestimation, as reflected by a smaller deviation of predicted and actual performance (selection margins) and fewer 0 point trials. Athletes and coaches should be aware that younger and less-experienced athletes tend to overestimate their motor performances. Highlights: An accurate estimation of one's performance is important for success. We asked children, teenagers and young adults to accurately predict their performances in rope skipping, soccer, and tracing. The deviation of predicted and actual performances are operationalized as "selection margins". Younger individuals overestimated their performances. Future research should investigate the influence of chronological age and expertise on these tendencies. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Psychology of sport and exercise. Volume 57(2021)
- Journal:
- Psychology of sport and exercise
- Issue:
- Volume 57(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 57, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 57
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0057-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-11
- Subjects:
- Expertise -- Development -- Strategy -- Motor task -- Risk-tasking -- Task-difficulty
Sports -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals
Exercise -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals
Psychology -- Periodicals
Sports -- Periodicals
Exercise -- Periodicals
Societies, Medical -- Periodicals
Psychology
Sports
Exercise
Societies, Medical
Sports -- Aspect psychologique -- Périodiques
Exercice -- Aspect psychologique -- Périodiques
613.71019 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14690292 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102031 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1469-0292
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6946.536590
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19553.xml