Dose calculation validation of a convolution algorithm in a solid water phantom. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dubus, François; Reynaert, Nick
• Is Part Of: Physica medica. Volume 89(2021)
• Page Start: 193
• Page End: 199
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: CT calibration curve -- Electron density -- Solid water phantom -- Dose calculation algorithm; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Biophysics -- Periodicals; Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques; Physique -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.08.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-1797

Abstract

Highlights: Dose calculation algorithms using electron density. Dose accuracy in solid water phantom. Appropriate CT calibration curve. Dose calculation agreement with CT calibration correction. Abstract: Purpose: The dose calculated using a convolution algorithm should be validated in a simple homogeneous water-equivalent phantom before clinical use. The dose calculation accuracy within a solid water phantom was investigated. Methods: The specific Gamma knife design requires a dose rate calibration within a spherical solid water phantom. The TMR10 algorithm, which approximates the phantom material as liquid water, correctly computes the absolute dose in water. The convolution algorithm, which considers electron density miscalculates the dose in water as the phantom Hounsfield units were converted into higher electron density when the original CT calibration curve was used. To address this issue, the electron density of liquid water was affected by modifying the CT calibration curve. The absolute dose calculated using the convolution algorithm was compared with that computed by the TMR10. The measured depth dose profiles were also compared to those computed by the convolution and TMR10 algorithms. A patient treatment was recalculated in the solid-water phantom and the delivery quality assurance was checked. Results: The convolution algorithm and the TMR10 calculate an absolute dose within 1% when using the modified CT calibration curve. The dose depth profile calculated using the convolution algorithms was superimposed on the TMR10 and measured dose profiles when the modified CT calibration curve was applied. The Gamma index was better than 93%. Conclusions: Dose calculation algorithms, which consider electron density, require a CT calibration curve adapted to the phantom material to correctly compute the dose in water.