Treatment of Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Repairs With A Resorbable Bioinductive Bovine Collagen Implant: 1-Year Results From A Prospective Multi-Center Registry. Issue 7 (30th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bishai, Shariff; Krupp, Ryan; McMillan, Sean; Schofield, Brian; Trenhaile, Scott; McIntyre, Louis; Bushnell, Brandon
• Is Part Of: Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine. Volume 9:Issue 7(2021)Supplement 4
• Publication Date: 2021-07-30
• Subjects: Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Arthroscopy -- Periodicals; Arthroplasty -- Periodicals; Knee -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.7
• DOI: 10.1177/2325967121S00209
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2325-9671

Abstract

Objectives: Surgical treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears remains challenging and controversial, with several traditional options including debridement with acromioplasty, transtendon or in-situ repair, and take-down and repair. A bioinductive resorbable bovine collagen implant has shown promise as an alternative treatment option for partial-thickness tears. It was our hypothesis that data from a comprehensive, prospective, multi-center registry will further establish the implant's efficacy and safety across larger numbers of patients. Methods: Nineteen US centers enrolled patients >21 years old with partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), single-assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), Veterans RAND 12-Item (VR-12) for both Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS), and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) outcome measures were recorded at pre-operative baseline, surgery, and postoperatively at 2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year. Revisions were reported throughout the study. Results: The registry included 272 patients with partial-thickness tears (49 grade 1 tears, 101 grade 2 tears, and 122 grade 3 tears), 241 who underwent isolated bioinductive repair ("IBR"; collagen implant placed over the tear following bursectomy without a traditional rotator cuff repair -FIGURE 1 ) and 31 tradtitional take-down and repair with supplemental placement of the implant. Patients experienced statistically significant and sustained improvement from baseline for all PRO scores beginning at 3 months (TABLE 1 ). Among patients with grade ≥2 tears, those with take-down and repair had significantly inferior scores at 2 and 6 weeks for most PRO scores compared with those undergoing IBR, but the difference was no longer significant at 1 year for all but VR-12 PCS. There were 11 revisions, which occurred at a mean of 188.7 days (standard deviation, 88.0) after index surgery. Conclusions: Efficacy and safety of the implant are further established across a larger data set. IBR may offer improved early clinical outcomes and equivalent long-term results to supplemented take-down and repair, potentially with lower risk of complications. This implant can improve rotator cuff healing and clinical outcomes with minimal revisions. :