3Rs missing: animal research without scientific value is unethical. Issue 1 (4th July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Strech, Daniel; Dirnagl, Ulrich
• Is Part Of: BMJ open science. Volume 3:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-07-04
• Subjects: Medical sciences -- Periodicals; Medical sciences -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjos-2018-000048
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-8703

Abstract

Abstract : The current, widely established 3R framework for the ethical use of animals in research consists of three guiding principles, that is, R eplacement, R eduction and R efinement, all aiming to safeguard the overarching ethical principle of animal welfare. However, animal welfare alone does not suffice to make animal research ethical if the research does not have sufficient scientific value. The scientific value of animal studies strongly decreases if they are not sufficiently robust, if their questions have already been sufficiently addressed or if the results are selectively reported. Against this background, we argue that three guiding principles are missing, that is, R obustness, R egistration and R eporting, all of which aim to safeguard and increase the scientific value of animal research. To establish a new 6R framework, we need a multistakeholder discourse to conceptualise the specific requirements of robustness, registration and reporting and to clarify responsibilities, competencies and legislation for auditing 6R compliance.