Do family physicans, emergency physicians and paediatricians give consistent sport-related concussion management advice?. Issue 5 (11th March 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Do family physicans, emergency physicians and paediatricians give consistent sport-related concussion management advice?. Issue 5 (11th March 2013)
- Main Title:
- Do family physicans, emergency physicians and paediatricians give consistent sport-related concussion management advice?
- Authors:
- Stoller, Jacqueline
Carson, James
Purcell, Laura
Davidson, Bruce
Garel, Alisha
Bell, Margaret
Snow, Catherine
Law, Marcus - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To identify differences and gaps in the recommendations to patients for the management of sport-related concussion among family physicians (FPs), emergency physicians (ERs) and paediatricians (Peds). Design: A self-administered multiple-choice survey, which had been validated for content validity. Setting: Toronto East General Hospital and Markham Stouffville Hospital, both in Ontario, Canada. Subjects: 270 physicians were invited to participate; 104 surveys were completed (39%). Intervention: The survey link was emailed to FPs, ERs and Peds from the above hospitals. Data were analysed using SPSS. Frequencies and percentages were calculated with cross-tabulation of data by specialty. Outcome Measures: Key survey questions identified sources of concussion management information, usefulness of concussion diagnosis strategies, and whether physicians use common terminology when explaining cognitive rest strategies to patients after a sport-related concussion. Results: For making a diagnosis of concussion, 54% of FPs, 86% of ERs and 78% of Peds never used the SCAT2; 49% of FPs, 57% of ERs and 36% of Peds always advised cognitive rest, the mainstay of early management for post-concussion symptoms; 65% of FPs, 71% of ERs and 55% of Peds always advised physical rest; and 49% of FPs, 52% of ERs and 27% of Peds reported no knowledge of any consensus statements on concussion in sport. Conclusions: We identified large gaps in the implementation of recommendationsAbstract : Objective: To identify differences and gaps in the recommendations to patients for the management of sport-related concussion among family physicians (FPs), emergency physicians (ERs) and paediatricians (Peds). Design: A self-administered multiple-choice survey, which had been validated for content validity. Setting: Toronto East General Hospital and Markham Stouffville Hospital, both in Ontario, Canada. Subjects: 270 physicians were invited to participate; 104 surveys were completed (39%). Intervention: The survey link was emailed to FPs, ERs and Peds from the above hospitals. Data were analysed using SPSS. Frequencies and percentages were calculated with cross-tabulation of data by specialty. Outcome Measures: Key survey questions identified sources of concussion management information, usefulness of concussion diagnosis strategies, and whether physicians use common terminology when explaining cognitive rest strategies to patients after a sport-related concussion. Results: For making a diagnosis of concussion, 54% of FPs, 86% of ERs and 78% of Peds never used the SCAT2; 49% of FPs, 57% of ERs and 36% of Peds always advised cognitive rest, the mainstay of early management for post-concussion symptoms; 65% of FPs, 71% of ERs and 55% of Peds always advised physical rest; and 49% of FPs, 52% of ERs and 27% of Peds reported no knowledge of any consensus statements on concussion in sport. Conclusions: We identified large gaps in the implementation of recommendations for sport-related concussion patients. Although some physicians are recommending physical and cognitive rest, a large proportion fail to consistently advise this strategy. Better knowledge translation efforts should target all three groups of physicians. Acknowledgements: Thank you to Babak Aliarzadeh for the statistical analysis. Special thanks go to Paul Krueger, Leigh Hayden and the other 18 participants in the validation of our survey. Competing interests: None. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of sports medicine. Volume 47:Issue 5(2013)
- Journal:
- British journal of sports medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 47:Issue 5(2013)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 5 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0047-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- e1
- Page End:
- e1
- Publication Date:
- 2013-03-11
- Subjects:
- Sports medicine -- Periodicals
617.1027 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bjsm.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bjsports-2012-092101.23 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0306-3674
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19509.xml