Early mobilisation versus plaster immobilisation of simple elbow dislocations: results of the FuncSiE multicentre randomised clinical trial. Issue 6 (14th July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Early mobilisation versus plaster immobilisation of simple elbow dislocations: results of the FuncSiE multicentre randomised clinical trial. Issue 6 (14th July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Early mobilisation versus plaster immobilisation of simple elbow dislocations: results of the FuncSiE multicentre randomised clinical trial
- Authors:
- Iordens, Gijs I T
Van Lieshout, Esther M M
Schep, Niels W L
De Haan, Jeroen
Tuinebreijer, Wim E
Eygendaal, Denise
Van Beeck, Ed
Patka, Peter
Verhofstad, Michael H J
Den Hartog, Dennis - Other Names:
- author non-byline.
Breederveld Roelf S author non-byline.
Bronkhorst Maarten WGA author non-byline.
De Vries Mark R author non-byline.
Dwars Boudewijn J author non-byline.
Haverlag Robert author non-byline.
Meylaerts Sven AG author non-byline.
Mulder Jan-Willem R author non-byline.
Ponsen Kees J author non-byline.
Roerdink W Herbert author non-byline.
Roukema Gert R author non-byline.
Schipper Inger B author non-byline.
Schouten Michel A author non-byline.
Sintenie Jan Bernard author non-byline.
Sivro Senail author non-byline.
Van den Brand Johan GH author non-byline.
Van der Linden Frits M author non-byline.
Van der Meulen Hub GWM author non-byline.
Verleisdonk Egbert JMM author non-byline.
Vroemen Jos PAM author non-byline.
Waleboer Marco author non-byline.
Willems W Jaap author non-byline. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background/aim: To compare outcome of early mobilisation and plaster immobilisation in patients with a simple elbow dislocation. We hypothesised that early mobilisation would result in earlier functional recovery. Methods: From August 2009 to September 2012, 100 adult patients with a simple elbow dislocation were enrolled in this multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to early mobilisation (n=48) or 3 weeks plaster immobilisation (n=52). Primary outcome measure was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand ( Quick -DASH) score. Secondary outcomes were the Oxford Elbow Score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, pain, range of motion, complications and activity resumption. Patients were followed for 1 year. Results: Quick -DASH scores at 1 year were 4.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 7.1) points in the early mobilisation group versus 4.2 (95% CI 1.2 to 7.2) in the plaster immobilisation group. At 6 weeks, early mobilised patients reported less disability ( Quick -DASH 12 (95% CI 9 to 15) points vs 19 (95% CI 16 to 22); p<0.05) and had a larger arc of flexion and extension (121° (95% CI 115° to 127°) vs 102° (95% CI 96° to 108°); p<0.05). Patients returned to work sooner after early mobilisation (10 vs 18 days; p=0.020). Complications occurred in 12 patients; this was unrelated to treatment. No recurrent dislocations occurred. Conclusions: Early active mobilisation is a safe and effective treatment for simple elbow dislocations. Patients recoveredAbstract : Background/aim: To compare outcome of early mobilisation and plaster immobilisation in patients with a simple elbow dislocation. We hypothesised that early mobilisation would result in earlier functional recovery. Methods: From August 2009 to September 2012, 100 adult patients with a simple elbow dislocation were enrolled in this multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomised to early mobilisation (n=48) or 3 weeks plaster immobilisation (n=52). Primary outcome measure was the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand ( Quick -DASH) score. Secondary outcomes were the Oxford Elbow Score, Mayo Elbow Performance Index, pain, range of motion, complications and activity resumption. Patients were followed for 1 year. Results: Quick -DASH scores at 1 year were 4.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 7.1) points in the early mobilisation group versus 4.2 (95% CI 1.2 to 7.2) in the plaster immobilisation group. At 6 weeks, early mobilised patients reported less disability ( Quick -DASH 12 (95% CI 9 to 15) points vs 19 (95% CI 16 to 22); p<0.05) and had a larger arc of flexion and extension (121° (95% CI 115° to 127°) vs 102° (95% CI 96° to 108°); p<0.05). Patients returned to work sooner after early mobilisation (10 vs 18 days; p=0.020). Complications occurred in 12 patients; this was unrelated to treatment. No recurrent dislocations occurred. Conclusions: Early active mobilisation is a safe and effective treatment for simple elbow dislocations. Patients recovered faster and returned to work earlier without increasing the complication rate. No evidence was found supporting treatment benefit at 1 year. Trial registration number: NTR 2025. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of sports medicine. Volume 51:Issue 6(2017)
- Journal:
- British journal of sports medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 51:Issue 6(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 51, Issue 6 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0051-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 531
- Page End:
- 538
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07-14
- Subjects:
- Elbow
Sports medicine -- Periodicals
617.1027 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bjsm.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094704 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0306-3674
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19527.xml