How is patient-centred care addressed in women's health? A theoretical rapid review. Issue 2 (13th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gagliardi, Anna R; Dunn, Sheila; Foster, Angel; Grace, Sherry L; Green, Courtney R; Khanlou, Nazilla; Miller, Fiona A; Stewart, Donna E; Vigod, Simone; Wright, Frances C
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 2(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-02-13
• Subjects: equity -- quality -- outcomes -- determinants -- policies -- interventions; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026121
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Efforts are needed to reduce gendered inequities and improve health and well-being for women. Patient-centred care (PCC), an approach that informs and engages patients in their own health, is positively associated with improved care delivery, experiences and outcomes. This study aimed to describe how PCC for women (PCCW) has been conceptualised in research. Methods: We conducted a theoretical rapid review of PCCW in four health conditions. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library and Joanna Briggs index for English-language articles published from January 2008 to February 2018 inclusive that investigated PCC and involved at least 50% women aged 18 or older. We analysed findings using a six-domain PCC framework, and reported findings with summary statistics and narrative descriptions. Results: After screening 2872 unique search results, we reviewed 51 full-text articles, and included 14 (five family planning, three preventive care, four depression, one cardiovascular disease and one rehabilitation). Studies varied in how they assessed PCC. None examined all six PCC framework domains; least evaluated domains were addressing emotions, managing uncertainty and enabling self-management. Seven studies that investigated PCC outcomes found a positive association with appropriate health service use, disease remission, health self-efficacy and satisfaction with care. Differing views about PCC between patients and physicians, physician PCC attitudes and geographic affluence influenced PCC. No studies evaluated the influence of patient characteristics or tested interventions to support PCCW. Conclusion: There is a paucity of research that has explored or evaluated PCCW in the conditions of interest. We excluded many studies because they arbitrarily labelled many topics as PCC, or simply concluded that PCC was needed. More research is needed to fully conceptualise and describe PCCW across different characteristics and conditions, and to test interventions that improve PCCW. Policies and incentives may also be needed to stimulate greater awareness and delivery of PCCW.