A systematic mapping protocol for understanding knowledge exchange in forest science. Issue 3 (27th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Westwood, Alana R.; Hutchen, Jenna; Kapoor, Tyreen; Klenk, Kimberly; Saturno, Jacquelyn; Wang, Jonathan; Falconer, Matthew; Nguyen, Vivian M.
• Is Part Of: Ecological solutions and evidence. Volume 2:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-08-27
• Subjects: forest management -- forest science -- forestry -- knowledge exchange -- knowledge mobilization -- knowledge production -- science transfer -- science–policy interface; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 333.72
• DOI: 10.1002/2688-8319.12096
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2688-8319

Abstract

Abstract: When making decisions about forest and environmental management, managers and policymakers often rely upon scientific knowledge. There is a well‐documented 'knowledge–integration gap' where often the production of knowledge and its use are not aligned. Though there are several theoretical frameworks that conceptualize how knowledge is exchanged between producers of scientific knowledge and users of that information, there has been little attention to documenting knowledge exchange practices and their effectiveness, especially about forests. In the systematic map, we will examine the peer‐reviewed academic and grey literature to document and classify the knowledge exchange techniques suggested and adopted by knowledge producers and users in the forest sciences globally. Characterizing this knowledge exchange landscape will provide new information about which techniques are used and their frequency, if there is evidence of effectiveness for particular techniques, and recommendations for best practices. This map will also show whether approaches to knowledge exchange differ between sectors (e.g. academia, government). We will create a systematic literature map as defined by the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence to capture case studies of, or theories about, knowledge exchange related to forest science. The search of peer‐reviewed academic and grey literature will be conducted in English and French in two academic databases (BASE and Scopus) and one specialist database (ResearchGate). Candidate search strings will be evaluated against a test list of documents to determine strings with maximum sensitivity and specificity. Eligibility criteria will be applied to items at two screening stages: (1) title and abstract and (2) full‐text. All screening decisions will be recorded in a database with 15% of full‐text screening decisions validated. Items retained for inclusion will have data extracted according to a standardized strategy. Each reviewer conducting data extraction will have at least three of their extractions validated. The systematic map will employ a narrative synthesis approach that includes descriptive statistics, tables, and figures which describe the types and frequency of knowledge exchange techniques theorized or described, a network map displaying the institutions within and between which knowledge exchange occurs, as well as summarizing any available evidence of effectiveness for particular knowledge exchange techniques. Abstract : Forest management requires a great deal of scientific knowledge, but there is a well‐documented 'knowledge–integration gap' where often the production of knowledge and its use are not aligned. We systematically map the peer‐reviewed academic and grey literature to document and classify the knowledge exchange techniques suggested and adopted by knowledge producers and users in the forest sciences globally in English and French. This Stage 1 article presents the protocol we will use to map and understand knowledge exchange techniques, who uses them and if there is any evidence of their effectiveness.