Effects of an arm‐support exoskeleton on perceived work intensity and musculoskeletal discomfort: An 18‐month field study in automotive assembly. Issue 11 (6th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Sunwook; Nussbaum, Maury A.; Smets, Marty; Ranganathan, Shyam
• Is Part Of: American journal of industrial medicine. Volume 64:Issue 11(2021)
• Page Start: 905
• Page End: 914
• Publication Date: 2021-08-06
• Subjects: ergonomic intervention -- manufacturing -- musculoskeletal discomfort -- perceived physical demand -- prospective study; Medicine, Industrial -- Periodicals; Médecine du travail -- Périodiques; 616.9803
• DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23282
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0271-3586

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Exoskeleton (EXO) technologies are a promising ergonomic intervention to reduce the risk of work‐related musculoskeletal disorders, with efficacy supported by laboratory‐ and field‐based studies. However, there is a lack of field‐based evidence on long‐term effects of EXO use on physical demands. Methods: A longitudinal, controlled research design was used to examine the effects of arm‐support exoskeleton (ASE) use on perceived physical demands during overhead work at nine automotive manufacturing facilities. Data were collected at five milestones (baseline and at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months) using questionnaires. Linear mixed models were used to understand the effects of ASE use on perceived work intensity and musculoskeletal discomfort (MSD). Analyses were based on a total of 41 participants in the EXO group and 83 in a control group. Results: Across facilities, perceived work intensity and MSD scores did not differ significantly between the EXO and control groups. In some facilities, however, neck and shoulder MSD scores in the EXO group decreased over time. Wrist MSD scores in the EXO group in some facilities remained unchanged, while those scores increased in the control group over time. Upper arm and low back MSD scores were comparable between the experimental groups. Conclusion: Longitudinal effects of ASE use on perceived physical demands were not found, though some suggestive results were evident. This lack of consistent findings is discussed, particularly supporting the need for systematic and evidence‐based ASE implementation approaches in the field that can guide the optimal selection of a job for ASE use.