Modelling growing stock volume of forest stands with various ALS area-based approaches. (9th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parkitna, Karolina; Krok, Grzegorz; Miścicki, Stanisław; Ukalski, Krzysztof; Lisańczuk, Marek; Mitelsztedt, Krzysztof; Magnussen, Steen; Markiewicz, Anna; Stereńczak, Krzysztof
• Is Part Of: Forestry. Volume 94:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 630
• Page End: 650
• Publication Date: 2021-04-09
• Subjects: Forests and forestry -- Periodicals; Forests and forestry -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 634.9
• DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpab011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0015-752X

Abstract

Abstract: Airborne laser scanning (ALS) is one of the most innovative remote sensing tools with a recognized important utility for characterizing forest stands. Currently, the most common ALS-based method applied in the estimation of forest stand characteristics is the area-based approach (ABA). The aim of this study was to analyse how three ABA methods affect growing stock volume (GSV) estimates at the sample plot and forest stand levels. We examined (1) an ABA with point cloud metrics, (2) an ABA with canopy height model (CHM) metrics and (3) an ABA with aggregated individual tree CHM-based metrics. What is more, three different modelling techniques: multiple linear regression, boosted regression trees and random forest, were applied to all ABA methods, which yielded a total of nine combinations to report. An important element of this work is also the empirical verification of the methods for estimating the GSV error for individual forest stand. All nine combinations of the ABA methods and different modelling techniques yielded very similar predictions of GSV for both sample plots and forest stands. The root mean squared error (RMSE) of estimated GSV ranged from 75 to 85 m 3 ha −1 (RMSE% = 20.5–23.4 per cent) and from 57 to 64 m 3 ha −1 (RMSE% = 16.4–18.3 per cent) for plots and stands, respectively. As a result of the research, it can be concluded that GSV modelling with the use of different ALS processing approaches and statistical methods leads to very similar results. Therefore, the choice of a GSV prediction method may be more determined by the availability of data and competences than by the requirement to use a particular method.