Head-to-head evaluation of seven different seroassays including direct viral neutralisation in a representative cohort for SARS-CoV-2. (8th October 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Head-to-head evaluation of seven different seroassays including direct viral neutralisation in a representative cohort for SARS-CoV-2. (8th October 2021)
- Main Title:
- Head-to-head evaluation of seven different seroassays including direct viral neutralisation in a representative cohort for SARS-CoV-2
- Authors:
- Olbrich, Laura
Castelletti, Noemi
Schälte, Yannik
Garí, Mercè
Pütz, Peter
Bakuli, Abhishek
Pritsch, Michael
Kroidl, Inge
Saathoff, Elmar
Guggenbuehl Noller, Jessica Michelle
Fingerle, Volker
Le Gleut, Ronan
Gilberg, Leonard
Brand, Isabel
Falk, Philine
Markgraf, Alisa
Deák, Flora
Riess, Friedrich
Diefenbach, Max
Eser, Tabea
Weinauer, Franz
Martin, Silke
Quenzel, Ernst-Markus
Becker, Marc
Durner, Jürgen
Girl, Philipp
Müller, Katharina
Radon, Katja
Fuchs, Christiane
Wölfel, Roman
Hasenauer, Jan
Hoelscher, Michael
Wieser, Andreas
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : A number of seroassays are available for SARS-CoV-2 testing; yet, head-to-head evaluations of different testing principles are limited, especially using raw values rather than categorical data. In addition, identifying correlates of protection is of utmost importance, and comparisons of available testing systems with functional assays, such as direct viral neutralisation, are needed.We analysed 6658 samples consisting of true-positives ( n =193), true-negatives ( n =1091), and specimens of unknown status ( n =5374). For primary testing, we used Euroimmun-Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA-IgA/IgG and Roche-Elecsys-Anti-SARS-CoV-2. Subsequently virus-neutralisation, GeneScriptcPass, VIRAMED-SARS-CoV-2-ViraChip, and Mikrogen- recom Line-SARS-CoV-2-IgG were applied for confirmatory testing. Statistical modelling generated optimised assay cut-off thresholds. Sensitivity of Euroimmun-anti-S1-IgA was 64.8%, specificity 93.3% (manufacturer's cut-off); for Euroimmun-anti-S1-IgG, sensitivity was 77.2/79.8% (manufacturer's/optimised cut-offs), specificity 98.0/97.8%; Roche-anti-N sensitivity was 85.5/88.6%, specificity 99.8/99.7%. In true-positives, mean and median Euroimmun-anti-S1-IgA and -IgG titres decreased 30/90 days after RT-PCR-positivity, Roche-anti-N titres decreased significantly later. Virus-neutralisation was 80.6% sensitive, 100.0% specific (≥1:5 dilution). Neutralisation surrogate tests (GeneScriptcPass, Mikrogen- recom Line-RBD) were >94.9% sensitive and >98.1% specific.Abstract : A number of seroassays are available for SARS-CoV-2 testing; yet, head-to-head evaluations of different testing principles are limited, especially using raw values rather than categorical data. In addition, identifying correlates of protection is of utmost importance, and comparisons of available testing systems with functional assays, such as direct viral neutralisation, are needed.We analysed 6658 samples consisting of true-positives ( n =193), true-negatives ( n =1091), and specimens of unknown status ( n =5374). For primary testing, we used Euroimmun-Anti-SARS-CoV-2-ELISA-IgA/IgG and Roche-Elecsys-Anti-SARS-CoV-2. Subsequently virus-neutralisation, GeneScriptcPass, VIRAMED-SARS-CoV-2-ViraChip, and Mikrogen- recom Line-SARS-CoV-2-IgG were applied for confirmatory testing. Statistical modelling generated optimised assay cut-off thresholds. Sensitivity of Euroimmun-anti-S1-IgA was 64.8%, specificity 93.3% (manufacturer's cut-off); for Euroimmun-anti-S1-IgG, sensitivity was 77.2/79.8% (manufacturer's/optimised cut-offs), specificity 98.0/97.8%; Roche-anti-N sensitivity was 85.5/88.6%, specificity 99.8/99.7%. In true-positives, mean and median Euroimmun-anti-S1-IgA and -IgG titres decreased 30/90 days after RT-PCR-positivity, Roche-anti-N titres decreased significantly later. Virus-neutralisation was 80.6% sensitive, 100.0% specific (≥1:5 dilution). Neutralisation surrogate tests (GeneScriptcPass, Mikrogen- recom Line-RBD) were >94.9% sensitive and >98.1% specific. Optimised cut-offs improved test performances of several tests. Confirmatory testing with virus-neutralisation might be complemented with GeneScriptcPass TM or recom Line-RBD for certain applications. Head-to-head comparisons given here aim to contribute to the refinement of testing strategies for individual and public health use. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of general virology. Volume 102:Number 10(2021)
- Journal:
- Journal of general virology
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Number 10(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 10 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0102-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-10-08
- Subjects:
- antibody -- COVID-19 -- nucleocapsid -- RBD -- SARS-CoV-2 -- serology -- spike -- virus neutralisation
Virology -- Periodicals
Viruses
Microbiology
Virology
Virologie -- Périodiques
Microbiologie -- Périodiques
Virology
Virologie
Virologie
Electronic journals
Periodical
Periodicals
579.2 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/jgv ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1099/jgv.0.001653 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-1317
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store
- Ingest File:
- 19360.xml