What is the impact of CT colonography interpretation by advanced practitioner radiographers on delivery of the 28 day colorectal cancer target?. Issue 4 (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bradbury, C.; Britton, I.; Morley-davies, A.; Balasubramaniam, R.
• Is Part Of: Radiography. Volume 27:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 1130
• Page End: 1134
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Gastrointestinal -- GI Advanced practice -- Service development -- Scope of practice -- MDT integration -- Cancer pathway; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancer -- Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.06.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1078-8174

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: CT Colonography (CTC) is an indicated test to assess the colon and rectum for evidence of polyps and neoplasms. The advanced practitioner radiographer (APR) is increasingly involved with the entirety of the radiology pathway including procedural modification, preliminary clinical evaluation (PCE) and multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting notification of high risk colonic pathologies. Methods: A retrospective audit of the Radiology Information System (RIS) was undertaken at a large secondary care centre, 12 months of data of 119 consecutive patients who had undergone CTC with summary coded reports of high risk pathology were included for analysis. Analysis of accuracy of procedural modification, PCE and impact of hypothesised earlier full radiological staging data being available for MDT discussions were measured and evaluated. Results: For high risk C4b studies, just 16.67% of colonic pathology was observed during the CTC study, rising to 79% during radiographer PCE. For likely colonic neoplasm C5a studies 86% of colonic pathology was observed during the CTC study, rising to 93% during radiographer PCE. Where subsequent CT chest staging was deemed necessary following CTC by the referring team, patients had a median wait of 34 days for completion CT chest scan staging. Conclusion: This study supports the integration of the advanced practitioner radiographer into the entire radiological processes of a CTC, with time advantages apparent for both diagnostics, but also the decision to treat. Implications for practice: Appropriately trained radiographers are able to support CTC services to ensure delivery of an effective two-week wait diagnostic service with direct MDT liaison.