Evaluation of surface wind using WRF in complex terrain: Atmospheric input data and grid spacing. (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Solbakken, Kine; Birkelund, Yngve; Samuelsen, Eirik Mikal
• Is Part Of: Environmental modelling & software. Volume 145(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Wind resource assessment -- WRF model -- ERA5 -- ERA-Interim -- Complex terrain -- Grid resolution; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Computer simulation -- Periodicals; Digital computer simulation -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Periodicals; Environmental Monitoring -- Periodicals; Computer Simulation -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Surveillance -- Logiciels -- Périodiques; Écologie -- Simulation, Méthodes de -- Périodiques; Simulation par ordinateur -- Périodiques; Logiciels -- Périodiques; Computer software; Digital computer simulation; Ecology -- Computer simulation; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70015118
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105182
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1364-8152

Abstract

Abstract: This study evaluates a numerical weather prediction model as a tool for wind resource assessment in complex terrain and how the simulations are affected by the selection of initial and boundary conditions and various grid resolutions. Two global reanalyses, ERA-Interim and ERA5, and four grid resolutions, 27 km, 9 km, 3 km and 1 km, have been considered. The simulations have been compared to hub-height wind measurements. The ERA5 forced simulations were found to provide improved wind speed results. The simulations show clear improvements in terms of lower error when the grid spacing is reduced from 27 km via 9 km to 3 km. From 3 km to 1 km, the error is not further reduced. However, the 1 km simulations tend to better reproduce the mean wind features and show defined areas with higher and lower wind speeds, providing useful information for wind resource mapping in complex terrain. Highlights: Evaluation of WRF wind simulation in a coastal and complex terrain in Norway. ERA5 provide improved WRF wind simulations compared to ERA-Interim. Higher resolution improves the WRF wind simulation results until a saturation point. The highest resolution simulations do not show improvements in terms of lower error. The 1 km model resolves jets and wakes better, but are not accurately positioned.