Predicting prognosis in COVID-19 patients using machine learning and readily available clinical data. (November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Campbell, Thomas W.; Wilson, Melissa P.; Roder, Heinrich; MaWhinney, Samantha; Georgantas, Robert W.; Maguire, Laura K.; Roder, Joanna; Erlandson, Kristine M.
• Is Part Of: International journal of medical informatics. Volume 155(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-11
• Subjects: Machine learning -- COVID-19 -- Prognostic models -- Risk assessment -- Clinical decision support systems; Medical informatics -- Periodicals; Information science -- Periodicals; Computers -- Periodicals; Medical technology -- Periodicals; Medical Informatics -- Periodicals; Technology, Medical -- Periodicals; Computers; Information science; Medical informatics; Medical technology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.285
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104594
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1386-5056

Abstract

Abstract: Rationale: Prognostic tools for aiding in the treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients could help improve outcome by identifying patients at higher or lower risk of severe disease. The study objective was to develop models to stratify patients by risk of severe outcomes during COVID-19 hospitalization using readily available information at hospital admission. Methods: Hierarchical ensemble classification models were trained on a set of 229 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 to predict severe outcomes, including ICU admission, development of acute respiratory distress syndrome, or intubation, using easily attainable attributes including basic patient characteristics, vital signs at admission, and basic lab results collected at time of presentation. Each test stratifies patients into groups of increasing risk. An additional cohort of 330 patients was used for blinded, independent validation. Shapley value analysis evaluated which attributes contributed most to the models' predictions of risk. Main results: Test performance was assessed using precision (positive predictive value) and recall (sensitivity) of the final risk groups. All test cut-offs were fixed prior to blinded validation. In development and validation, the tests achieved precision in the lowest risk groups near or above 0.9. The proportion of patients with severe outcomes significantly increased across increasing risk groups. While the importance of attributes varied by test and patient, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer were often found to be important in the assignment of risk. Conclusions: Risk of severe outcomes for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection can be assessed using machine learning-based models based on attributes routinely collected at hospital admission.