3D measurements of hydrate surface area during hydrate dissociation in porous media using dynamic 3D imaging. (1st April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jarrar, Zaher A.; Alshibli, Khalid A.; Al-Raoush, Riyadh I.; Jung, Jongwon
• Is Part Of: Fuel. Volume 265(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-04-01
• Subjects: Gas hydrates -- Computed tomography -- 3D imaging -- Dissociation rate -- Hydrate pore habit; Fuel -- Periodicals; Coal -- Periodicals; Coal; Fuel; Periodicals; 662.6
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116978
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-2361

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Abstract: A better understanding of the kinetics of hydrate dissociation is essential to reliably predict gas production potential from natural hydrate reservoirs. Most hydrate dissociation models assume hydrates to be a constant number of equal-sized spheres dissociating at a constant rate. This paper uses dynamic 3D synchrotron micro-computed tomography (SMT) imaging to study hydrate surface area evolution during Xenon hydrate dissociation. Hydrates are formed inside a high-pressure low-temperature cell filled with partially saturated ASTM 20-30 Ottawa sand. Hydrate dissociation is initiated through depressurization in the first experiment and through thermal stimulation in the second experiment. During dissociation, continuous full 3D SMT images were acquired where each scan took 45 s to complete. A combination of cementing, pore-filling, and surface coating pore habits were observed for the depressurization experiment and pore-filling for the thermal stimulation experiment. Surface coating hydrates dissociate faster than hydrates with pore-filling pore habit due to the higher specific area which allows for more surface for hydrates to dissociate it. Direct measurements of hydrate volume and hydrate surface area suggest that even with a combination of hydrate pore habits formed within the 3D porous media, estimation of hydrate surface area as a linear relation with (hydrate volume) 2/3 is best for hydrate saturation less than a threshold value depending on the dissociation method and driving force. (hydrate volume) 2 and (hydrate volume) 3 were found to better estimate hydrate interfacial area in comparison to (hydrate volume) 2/3 for the depressurization experiment and thermal stimulation experiment, respectively.