ISOLATED SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION AND COMBINED SYSTOLIC-DIASTOLIC HYPERTEN-SION FOR PREDICTION OF NEW-ONSET DIABETES MELLITUS - DATA FROM A 8-YEAR-FOLLOW-UP STUDY. (April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tsioufis, K.; Dimitriadis, K.; Liatakis, I.; Koutra, E.; Leontsinis, I.; Kouremeti, M.; Iliakis, I.; Karaminas, N.; Thomopoulos, K.; Tousoulis, D.
• Is Part Of: Journal of hypertension. Volume 39(2021)e-Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2021-04
• Subjects: Hypertension -- Periodicals; Hypertension -- Periodicals; 616.132005
• DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000746780.86419.2a
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1473-5598

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) and combined systolic-diastolic hypertension (CH) are related with increased cardiovascular risk, while new-onset diabetes mellitus (NOD) is linked with atherosclerosis progression. To compare the predictive role of ISH and CH for the incidence of NOD in a cohort of essential hypertensive patients. Design and method: We followed up 1435 non-diabetic essential hypertensives with office systolic blood pressure (BP)> or = 140 mmHg [mean age 57 years, 730 males, office BP=153/92 mmHg] for a mean period of 8 years. All subjects had at least one annual visit and at baseline underwent echocardiographic study and blood sampling for estimation of metabolic profile. Patients with baseline ISH exhibited office systolic BP > or =140 mmHg and office diastolic BP <90 mmHg, while those with CH had office systolic BP > or = 140 mmHg and office diastolic BP> or =90 mmHg. Moreover, NOD was defined if at one or more of the follow-up visits a previously non-diabetic patient reported being on insulin or an oral hypoglycemic drug or if casual plasma glucose concentration > or = 200 mg/dl or fasting glucose concentration > or = 126 mg/dl or 2-h post load glucose > or = 200 mg/dl during an oral glucose tolerance test. Results: The incidence of NOD over the follow-up period was 4.2% (n = 60). Patients with ISH (n = 460) compared to those with CH (n = 975) were older (65 ± 11 vs 54 ± 10 years, p < 0.0001), had at baseline lower waist circumference (94.5 ± 11 vs 99 ± 13 cm, p < 0.0001), office systolic BP (149 ± 12 vs 155 ± 13 mmHg, p < 0.0001), office diastolic BP (80 ± 8 vs 98 ± 6 mmHg, p < 0.0001), while did not differ regarding left ventricular mass index, glucose and lipid levels (p = NS for all). Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that baseline ISH (hazard ratio = 2.143, p = 0.016) and CH (hazard ratio=1.272, p = 0.029) predicted NOD. However, in multivariate Cox regression model, CH did not turn out to be an independent predictor of NOD. Conclusions: In essential hypertensive patients, ISH but not CH exhibits independent prognostic value for NOD. These findings support that ISH constitutes a hypertensive phenotype of increased metabolic risk needing careful evaluation and treatment.