Balancing obligations: should written information about life-sustaining treatment be neutral?. Issue 3 (24th April 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Balancing obligations: should written information about life-sustaining treatment be neutral?. Issue 3 (24th April 2014)
- Main Title:
- Balancing obligations: should written information about life-sustaining treatment be neutral?
- Authors:
- Xafis, Vicki
Wilkinson, Dominic
Gillam, Lynn
Sullivan, Jane - Abstract:
- Abstract : Parents who are facing decisions about life-sustaining treatment for their seriously ill or dying child are supported by their child's doctors and nurses. They also frequently seek other information sources to help them deal with the medical and ethical questions that arise. This might include written or web-based information. As part of a project involving the development of such a resource to support parents facing difficult decisions, some ethical questions emerged. Should this information be presented in a strictly neutral fashion? Is it problematic if narratives, arguments or perspectives appear to favour stopping over continuing life-sustaining treatment? Similar questions might arise with written materials about decisions for adults, or for other ethically contentious decisions. This paper explores the meaning of 'balance' in information provision, focusing particularly on written information about life-sustaining treatment for children. We contrast the norm of non-directiveness in genetic counselling with the shared decision-making model often endorsed in end-of-life care. We review evidence that parents do not find neutrality from medical professionals helpful in discussions. We argue that balance in written information must be understood in the light of the aim of the document, the most common situation in which it will be used, and any existing biases. We conclude with four important strategies for ensuring that non-neutral information is neverthelessAbstract : Parents who are facing decisions about life-sustaining treatment for their seriously ill or dying child are supported by their child's doctors and nurses. They also frequently seek other information sources to help them deal with the medical and ethical questions that arise. This might include written or web-based information. As part of a project involving the development of such a resource to support parents facing difficult decisions, some ethical questions emerged. Should this information be presented in a strictly neutral fashion? Is it problematic if narratives, arguments or perspectives appear to favour stopping over continuing life-sustaining treatment? Similar questions might arise with written materials about decisions for adults, or for other ethically contentious decisions. This paper explores the meaning of 'balance' in information provision, focusing particularly on written information about life-sustaining treatment for children. We contrast the norm of non-directiveness in genetic counselling with the shared decision-making model often endorsed in end-of-life care. We review evidence that parents do not find neutrality from medical professionals helpful in discussions. We argue that balance in written information must be understood in the light of the aim of the document, the most common situation in which it will be used, and any existing biases. We conclude with four important strategies for ensuring that non-neutral information is nevertheless ethically appropriate. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of medical ethics. Volume 41:Issue 3(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of medical ethics
- Issue:
- Volume 41:Issue 3(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0041-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 234
- Page End:
- 239
- Publication Date:
- 2014-04-24
- Subjects:
- End of Life Care -- Clinical Ethics
Medical ethics -- Periodicals
174.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://jme.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/03066800.html ↗
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/168/ ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/medethics-2013-101965 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0306-6800
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19240.xml