A genome-wide association study suggests contrasting associations in ACPA-positive versus ACPA-negative rheumatoid arthritis. Issue 2 (14th December 2010)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Padyukov, Leonid; Seielstad, Mark; Ong, Rick T H; Ding, Bo; Rönnelid, Johan; Seddighzadeh, Maria; Alfredsson, Lars; Klareskog, Lars
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 70:Issue 2(2011)
• Page Start: 259
• Page End: 265
• Publication Date: 2010-12-14
• Subjects: Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.126821
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be divided into two major subsets based on the presence or absence of antibodies to citrullinated peptide antigens (ACPA). Until now, data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have only been published from ACPA-positive subsets of RA or from studies that have not separated the two subsets. The aim of the current study is to provide and compare GWAS data for both subsets. Methods: and results GWAS using the Illumina 300K chip was performed for 774 ACPA-negative patients with RA, 1147 ACPA-positive patients with RA and 1079 controls from the Swedish population-based case–control study EIRA. Imputation was performed which allowed comparisons using 1 723 056 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). No SNP achieved genome-wide significance (2.9 × 10 –8 ) in the comparison between ACPA-negative RA and controls. A case–case association study was then performed between ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive RA groups. The major difference in this analysis was in the HLA region where 768 HLA SNPs passed the threshold for genome-wide significance whereas additional contrasting SNPs did not reach genome-wide significance. However, one SNP close to the RPS12P4 locus in chromosome 2 reached a p value of 2 × 10 6 and this locus can thus be considered as a tentative candidate locus for ACPA-negative RA. Conclusions: ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative RA display significant risk allele frequency differences which are mainly confined to the HLA region. The data provide further support for distinct genetic aetiologies of RA subsets and emphasise the need to consider them separately in genetic as well as functional studies of this disease.