PO 8441 Experimental comparison of sensitivity of LAMP and real-time PCR. (24th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kaboré, Jacques; Ilboudo, Hamidou; Compaoré, Charlie FA; Camara, Oumou; Bamba, Mohamed; Sakandé, Hassane; Camara, Mamadou; Bucheton, Bruno; Kaba, Dramane; Jamonneau, Vincent; Deborggraeve, Stijn; Lejon, Veerle
• Is Part Of: BMJ global health. Volume 4(2019)Supplement 3
• Page Start: A37
• Page End: A38
• Publication Date: 2019-04-24
• Subjects: World health -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-EDC.98
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2059-7908

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Human African trypanosomiasis, or sleeping sickness, remains a serious problem in tropical Africa. Timely diagnosis of this disease requires systematic population screening, particularly for Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, which has a long asymptomatic period. The lack of sensitivity and specificity of conventional diagnostic tests has led in recent years to the use of molecular tools. Amplification of parasite-specific DNA sequences significantly improved diagnosis of infection. However, these molecular tools still have some limitations especially in the case of low parasitaemia. Furthermore, research is still needed to make molecular detection a real control tool for the fight against sleeping sickness. The purpose of this study is to determine the threshold of sensitivity of real-time PCR using the 18S and TgsGp primers and of the LAMP technique, applied in the DiTECT-HAT project as molecular reference tests. Methods: We used serial dilutions containing 0, 1, 10, 100, 10 3, 10 4, 10 5, 10 6 parasites per ml of blood. Samples were extracted, and DNA was amplified. Results: The analytical sensitivity of the 18S real-time PCR with the Taqman probe of the filter paper samples is 100 parasites/ml and that of the TgsGp real-time PCR with the Taqman probe of filter paper samples is 10 4 parasites/ml. For Lamp technique, the analytical sensitivity is 10 3 parasites/ml. Conclusion: This study shows that a 'negative PCR' would not mean 'no parasite'. It suggests that DNA detection techniques should still be improved.