What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. Issue 2 (8th August 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lorenc, Theo; Petticrew, Mark; Welch, Vivian; Tugwell, Peter
• Is Part Of: Journal of epidemiology and community health. Volume 67:Issue 2(2013)
• Page Start: 190
• Page End: 193
• Publication Date: 2012-08-08
• Subjects: Health status disparities -- public health -- research design -- review literature as topic -- socioeconomic factors; Public health -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.4
• DOI: 10.1136/jech-2012-201257
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-005X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Some effective public health interventions may increase inequalities by disproportionately benefiting less disadvantaged groups ('intervention-generated inequalities' or IGIs). There is a need to understand which types of interventions are likely to produce IGIs, and which can reduce inequalities. Methods: We conducted a rapid overview of systematic reviews to identify evidence on IGIs by socioeconomic status. We included any review of non-healthcare interventions in high-income countries presenting data on differential intervention effects on any health status or health behaviour outcome. Results were synthesised narratively. Results: The following intervention types show some evidence of increasing inequalities (IGIs) between socioeconomic status groups: media campaigns; and workplace smoking bans. However, for many intervention types, data on potential IGIs are lacking. By contrast, the following show some evidence of reducing health inequalities: structural workplace interventions; provision of resources; and fiscal interventions, such as tobacco pricing. Conclusion: Our findings are consistent with the idea that 'downstream' preventive interventions are more likely to increase health inequalities than 'upstream' interventions. More consistent reporting of differential intervention effectiveness is required to help build the evidence base on IGIs.