Handover training: does one size fit all? The merits of mass customisation. Issue 1 (30th October 2012)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Handover training: does one size fit all? The merits of mass customisation. Issue 1 (30th October 2012)
- Main Title:
- Handover training: does one size fit all? The merits of mass customisation
- Authors:
- Kicken, Wendy
Van der Klink, Marcel
Barach, Paul
Boshuizen, HPA - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Experts have recommended training and standardisation as promising approaches to improve handovers and minimise the negative consequences of discontinuity of care. Yet the content and delivery of handover training have been only superficially examined and described in literature. Objective: The aim of this study was to formulate recommendations for effective handover training and to examine whether standardisation is a viable approach to training large numbers of healthcare professionals. Methods: A training needs analysis was conducted by means of a questionnaire, which was filled out by 96 healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care in the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Poland. Preferences and recommendations regarding training delivery aspects and training topics that should be included in the handover training were measured. Results: The majority of the participants recommended a short conventional training session with practice assignments, to be completed in small, multidisciplinary groups. Formal examination, e-learning and self-study were not favoured. Recommended training topics were: communication skills, standardised procedures, knowing what to hand over, alertness to vulnerable patient groups and awareness of responsibility. Conclusions: The idea of completely standardised handover training is not in line with the identified differences in preferences and recommendations between different handover stakeholders. Mass customisationAbstract : Background: Experts have recommended training and standardisation as promising approaches to improve handovers and minimise the negative consequences of discontinuity of care. Yet the content and delivery of handover training have been only superficially examined and described in literature. Objective: The aim of this study was to formulate recommendations for effective handover training and to examine whether standardisation is a viable approach to training large numbers of healthcare professionals. Methods: A training needs analysis was conducted by means of a questionnaire, which was filled out by 96 healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care in the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and Poland. Preferences and recommendations regarding training delivery aspects and training topics that should be included in the handover training were measured. Results: The majority of the participants recommended a short conventional training session with practice assignments, to be completed in small, multidisciplinary groups. Formal examination, e-learning and self-study were not favoured. Recommended training topics were: communication skills, standardised procedures, knowing what to hand over, alertness to vulnerable patient groups and awareness of responsibility. Conclusions: The idea of completely standardised handover training is not in line with the identified differences in preferences and recommendations between different handover stakeholders. Mass customisation of training, in which generic training is adapted to local or individual needs, presents a promising solution to address general and specific needs, while containing the financial and time costs of designing and delivering handover training. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ quality & safety. Volume 21:Issue 1(2011)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- BMJ quality & safety
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Issue 1(2011)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 1 (2011)
- Year:
- 2011
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2011-0021-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- i84
- Page End:
- i88
- Publication Date:
- 2012-10-30
- Subjects:
- Medical education -- Patient safety -- Hand-off -- Quality improvement
Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals
Health facilities -- Risk management -- Periodicals
Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals
362.106805 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001164 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-5415
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19223.xml